✏️ FREE Suggested A Level GP Essay Notes

Square
5/5 - 1 reviews

FREE Suggested A Level GP Sample Essays

These are just suggested points you might find useful to refer for your GP Essays. Use with care.
 

GP A Level 2022 Questions

 
 
1. Consider the view that people imprisoned for crimes should lose all their rights.
 
There is a view that people who are imprisoned for crimes should lose all of their rights while they are serving their sentences. This view is often supported by the idea that individuals who have broken the law and been found guilty in a court of justice should be held accountable for their actions and should be punished accordingly.
 
One view is that by depriving prisoners of their rights, it serves as a deterrent for others who may be considering committing crimes. It also ensures that those who have committed serious offenses are unable to continue to engage in criminal behavior while they are incarcerated.
 
However, some argue that all people, including prisoners, have basic human rights that should not be taken away, regardless of their actions. Depriving prisoners of their rights can also lead to inhumane conditions and mistreatment within the prison system.
 
In my view, while it is important for individuals who have committed crimes to be held accountable for their actions and to receive punishment, it is also important to recognize that all people, including prisoners, have basic human rights that should not be infringed upon. There are alternative approaches to punishment, such as rehabilitation programs, that can be more effective in addressing the root causes of criminal behavior and preventing future offenses.
 
One example of this approach is the Norwegian prison system, which focuses on rehabilitation and reintegration into society rather than punishment and deprivation of rights. This approach has been shown to have a lower recidivism rate compared to more punitive systems.
 
In conclusion, while the view that prisoners should lose all of their rights may be rooted in the desire to hold individuals accountable for their actions and to deter others from committing crimes, it is important to also consider the negative consequences of depriving prisoners of their basic human rights and to consider alternative approaches to punishment that prioritize rehabilitation and reintegration into society.
 
 
2. Does religion still have a role in the modern world?
 
Religion has been a significant aspect of human culture and society for millennia, and continues to be practiced by a large percentage of the global population today. However, the role of religion in the modern world is a subject of much debate and discussion.
 
On one hand, religion can provide individuals with a sense of purpose, meaning, and community. It can also serve as a source of moral guidance and support for individuals in times of crisis or hardship. Many religious traditions also promote charitable work and social justice, which can have a positive impact on communities and societies.
 
On the other hand, some argue that religion can be used to justify violence and conflict, and has been the cause of numerous wars and acts of terrorism throughout history. It can also be used to discriminate against and marginalize certain groups of people based on their beliefs or practices. In addition, the strict adherence to certain religious beliefs can sometimes conflict with scientific discoveries or progress.
 
In my view, while religion can certainly have both positive and negative impacts on individuals and societies, it is important to recognize that it can also play a valuable role in providing a sense of purpose and meaning, as well as promoting charitable work and social justice. It is important, however, to also recognize that religion should not be used to justify violence or discrimination, and that it should be open to examination and debate, just like any other aspect of human society.
 
One example of the positive role that religion can play in the modern world is the work of the Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism. He has worked for decades to promote peace, nonviolence, and understanding between different cultures and religions, and has received numerous accolades for his efforts, including the Nobel Peace Prize.
 
In conclusion, while the role of religion in the modern world is a complex and nuanced issue, it is clear that it can have both positive and negative impacts on individuals and societies. It is important to recognize and appreciate the positive contributions of religion while also being mindful of its potential drawbacks and ensuring that it is not used to justify violence or discrimination.
 
 
3. Dramas on television or film are never as effective as a live performance. Discuss.
 
There is a view that live performances of plays or musicals are inherently more effective than their televised or film adaptations. This view is often supported by the idea that the energy and immediacy of a live performance cannot be replicated by a pre-recorded or broadcasted version.
 
There are several pros to this view. One argument is that live performances allow for a level of interaction and engagement between the performers and the audience that cannot be achieved through a televised or film adaptation. In addition, live performances allow for a greater sense of immersion and presence in the story being told, as the audience is physically present in the same space as the performers.
 
However, one argument is that televised or film adaptations of plays and musicals can reach a wider audience than a live performance, which is limited by geography and ticket availability. In addition, these adaptations can often include higher production values and special effects that may not be possible in a live performance.
 
In my view, while it is true that live performances offer a unique and powerful experience that cannot be fully replicated through a televised or film adaptation, it is important to also recognize the value and potential of these mediums. Television and film adaptations of plays and musicals can reach a wider audience and allow for a level of storytelling and production that may not be possible in a live setting.
 
One example of the success of a televised or film adaptation of a live performance is the Broadway musical “Hamilton,” which was filmed and released on Disney+ to widespread acclaim. The film version of the musical allowed for a level of accessibility and reach that would not have been possible through a live performance alone.
 
In conclusion, while live performances of plays and musicals offer a unique and powerful experience, it is important to also recognize the value and potential of televised and film adaptations. These mediums can reach a wider audience and allow for a level of storytelling and production that may not be possible in a live setting.
 
 
4. Assess the extent to which different age groups in your society are valued equally.
 
In Singapore, the extent to which different age groups are valued equally is a complex and nuanced issue. On one hand, Singapore has implemented a number of policies and initiatives aimed at promoting intergenerational solidarity and reducing age segregation. These include initiatives such as the “Silver Support Scheme,” which provides targeted financial assistance to low-income elderly citizens, and the “Elderspeak” training program, which teaches caregivers how to communicate effectively with older people.
 
However, one argument is that certain age groups, particularly older individuals, may face discrimination or prejudice in the workplace, leading to lower employment rates and opportunities for advancement. In addition, there is a lack of accessible and affordable housing options for elderly citizens, which can lead to age segregation and a lack of intergenerational contact.
 
In my view, while Singapore has made efforts to value all age groups equally and to address issues of age-based discrimination and segregation, there is still more work to be done to ensure that all individuals, regardless of age, are able to fully participate in and contribute to their community. This includes providing equal opportunities for education, employment, and participation in community and civic life, as well as addressing issues such as access to affordable housing and employment discrimination.
 
One example of an initiative that has sought to promote intergenerational contact and cooperation in Singapore is the “Elders-in-Residence” program, which pairs elderly citizens with school-aged children to engage in activities such as storytelling and craft-making. This program has been successful in fostering intergenerational understanding and friendships, and has been implemented in a number of schools across Singapore.
 
In conclusion, while Singapore has made efforts to value all age groups equally and to promote intergenerational solidarity, there is still more work to be done to ensure that all individuals, regardless of age, are able to fully participate in and contribute to their community. It is important for societies to address issues such as employment discrimination and a lack of affordable housing options for elderly citizens in order to promote equal opportunities and a sense of inclusivity for all age groups.
 
 
5. To what extent can individuals shape their own lives when the world is so unpredictable?
 
It is often argued that the world is increasingly unpredictable and that individuals have limited control over the events and circumstances that shape their lives. However, there is also a view that individuals have the ability to shape their own lives to a significant extent, despite the unpredictable nature of the world.
 
On one hand, there are several arguments in favor of the idea that individuals have the power to shape their own lives. One argument is that individuals have agency and the ability to make choices that can impact the direction of their lives. In addition, individuals have the power to take action and pursue opportunities that can help to shape their lives in positive ways.
 
However, one argument is that external factors, such as economic conditions, political systems, and natural disasters, can have a significant impact on an individual’s circumstances and opportunities. In addition, certain individuals may face structural or systemic barriers that limit their ability to shape their own lives.
 
In my view, while it is true that the world is unpredictable and that external factors can have a significant impact on an individual’s circumstances, it is also important to recognize that individuals have agency and the ability to make choices that can shape the course of their lives. This includes taking action and pursuing opportunities, as well as advocating for change and addressing structural or systemic barriers that may limit their ability to shape their own lives.
 
One example of an individual who has been able to shape their own life despite external challenges is Malala Yousafzai, a Pakistani activist for female education and the youngest Nobel Prize laureate. Despite facing threats and violence due to her advocacy, Yousafzai has continued to speak out and take action to promote education for girls in her community and beyond.
 
In conclusion, while the world is unpredictable and external factors can have a significant impact on an individual’s circumstances, it is important to recognize that individuals have the power to shape their own lives to a significant extent. This includes taking action and pursuing opportunities, as well as advocating for change and addressing structural or systemic barriers.
 
 
6. Too many historical figures are famous for the wrong reasons. Discuss.
 
There is a view that many historical figures have become famous for the wrong reasons, and that their legacies are not always representative of their true impact or contributions. This view is often supported by the idea that the stories and narratives that are passed down about historical figures can be shaped and influenced by various biases and agendas.
 
On one hand, there are several arguments in favor of the idea that many historical figures are famous for the wrong reasons. One argument is that the stories and narratives that are told about these figures often focus on sensational or controversial aspects of their lives, rather than their true impact or contributions. In addition, certain historical figures may be celebrated for their accomplishments in one area, while their negative actions or beliefs in other areas are overlooked or downplayed.
 
However, one argument is that the stories and narratives that are passed down about historical figures are often shaped by the perspectives and experiences of those who are telling them, and may not always be fully accurate or complete. In addition, it is important to recognize that historical figures were products of their time and that their actions and beliefs should be understood within their historical context.
 
In my view, while it is important to critically examine the stories and narratives that are passed down about historical figures and to recognize that they can be shaped by various biases and agendas, it is also important to recognize that historical figures were products of their time and that their actions and beliefs should be understood within their historical context. It is important to strive for a nuanced and balanced understanding of historical figures, rather than simply celebrating or condemning them based on a single aspect of their lives.
 
One example of a historical figure who is often celebrated for the wrong reasons is Christopher Columbus, who is often credited with “discovering” America and is celebrated with holidays in a number of countries. However, Columbus’s actions and beliefs, particularly in relation to the treatment of indigenous peoples, have been widely criticized and his legacy is often viewed in a more complex and nuanced manner.
 
In conclusion, while it is true that many historical figures are famous for the wrong reasons and that the stories and narratives that are passed down about them can be shaped by various biases and agendas, it is important to strive for a nuanced and balanced understanding of these figures and to recognize their actions and beliefs within their historical context.
 
 
7. The results of scientific research should be available to everyone. How far do you agree?
 
There is a view that the results of scientific research should be freely and widely available to all individuals, as they have the potential to benefit society as a whole. This view is often supported by the idea that scientific research is a public good and that it should be shared and disseminated in order to advance knowledge and understanding.
 
On one hand, there are several arguments in favor of the idea that the results of scientific research should be available to everyone. One argument is that making scientific research widely available can facilitate the sharing of knowledge and ideas, which can lead to new discoveries and innovations. In addition, making scientific research available to everyone can ensure that all individuals have access to accurate and reliable information, which can be especially important in the context of issues such as public health and policy.
 
However, one argument is that making scientific research widely available can lead to a lack of financial incentives for researchers, which can discourage investment in scientific research and innovation. In addition, certain types of scientific research, such as that involving sensitive or proprietary information, may be restricted in order to protect intellectual property or other interests.
 
In my view, while it is important to recognize the value of making scientific research widely available, it is also important to consider the potential drawbacks and to strike a balance between accessibility and the need to protect intellectual property and other interests. This may involve implementing mechanisms such as open access publishing, which allows for the dissemination of scientific research while also protecting the interests of researchers and institutions.
 
One example of a model for making scientific research widely available is the “open science” movement, which advocates for the free and open access to the results of scientific research. This movement has gained traction in recent years and has led to the implementation of initiatives such as open access publishing and the creation of online repositories of scientific research.
 
In conclusion, while the results of scientific research should be widely available in order to advance knowledge and understanding and to ensure that all individuals have access to accurate and reliable information, it is also important to consider the potential drawbacks and to strike a balance between accessibility and the need to protect intellectual property and other interests. Initiatives such as open access publishing and the “open science” movement can help to achieve this balance.
 
 
8. Examine the claim that music without words lacks both meaning and appeal.
 
There is a view that music without words, often referred to as instrumental music, lacks both meaning and appeal compared to music that includes lyrics. This view is often supported by the idea that lyrics add an additional layer of meaning and context to music, and that instrumental music is therefore less able to convey emotion or tell a story.
 
On one hand, there are several arguments in favor of the idea that instrumental music lacks both meaning and appeal. One argument is that lyrics provide a direct means of conveying a message or story, which can be lacking in instrumental music. In addition, some people may find it more difficult to connect emotionally with instrumental music, as they do not have the added context provided by lyrics.
 
However, one argument is that instrumental music can still convey emotion and tell a story, even without lyrics. This can be achieved through the use of melody, harmony, and other musical elements, which can elicit strong emotional responses in listeners. In addition, instrumental music can often be more universal in its appeal, as it is not limited by language or cultural barriers.
 
In my view, while it is true that lyrics can add an additional layer of meaning and context to music, it is also important to recognize that instrumental music can still convey emotion and tell a story, and that it can have a strong appeal to listeners. It is important to appreciate the diverse range of music that exists, including both music with lyrics and instrumental music, and to recognize that both types of music can have meaning and appeal.
 
One example of instrumental music that has both meaning and appeal is the “Adagio for Strings,” a piece by composer Samuel Barber. This piece, which is often played at funerals and other solemn occasions, is able to convey a powerful emotional message without the use of lyrics.
 
In conclusion, while it is true that lyrics can add an additional layer of meaning and context to music, it is important to recognize that instrumental music can still convey emotion and tell a story, and that it can have a strong appeal to listeners. It is important to appreciate the diverse range of music that exists, including both music with lyrics and instrumental music, and to recognize that both types of music can have meaning and appeal. It is important to approach music with an open mind and to consider the diverse ways in which it can convey emotion, tell a story, and connect with listeners.
 
 
9. Since the extinction of species is a natural phenomenon, is there any point in trying to prevent it?
 
The extinction of species is a natural phenomenon that has occurred throughout the history of life on Earth. However, there is a view that the current rate of species extinction is higher than it has been in the past, and that human activities, such as habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change, are contributing to this trend. This has led to the question of whether it is worthwhile to try to prevent species extinction.
 
On one hand, there are several arguments in favor of trying to prevent species extinction. One argument is that species play important roles in ecosystems and their extinction can have cascading effects on other species and the overall health of the ecosystem. In addition, many species have cultural, aesthetic, and economic value, and their extinction can have negative impacts on human communities and industries.
 
However, one argument is that the resources and efforts required to prevent species extinction may be better directed towards other priorities, such as addressing issues of poverty and disease. In addition, it may be difficult or impossible to intervene in natural processes, such as habitat destruction or climate change, in order to prevent species extinction.
 
In my view, while it is true that species extinction is a natural phenomenon and that resources and efforts have limited scope, it is important to recognize the potential negative impacts of species extinction on ecosystems and human communities. This includes the cultural, aesthetic, and economic value of species, as well as the potential cascading effects of species extinction on other species and ecosystems. Therefore, it is important to take steps to prevent species extinction where possible, while also recognizing the limitations and challenges of this task. This may involve implementing conservation measures, such as protected areas and habitat restoration, and addressing the root causes of species extinction, such as habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change.
 
An example of an effort to prevent species extinction is the work of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), which has compiled a “Red List” of threatened and endangered species and works to promote conservation efforts and policies.
 
In conclusion, while the extinction of species is a natural phenomenon, it is important to recognize the potential negative impacts of species extinction on ecosystems and human communities. This includes the cultural, aesthetic, and economic value of species, as well as the potential cascading effects of species extinction on other species and ecosystems. Therefore, it is important to take steps to prevent species extinction where possible, while also recognizing the limitations and challenges of this task. This may involve implementing conservation measures and addressing the root causes of species extinction.
 
 
10. Consumerism is more of a curse than a blessing. How true is this of your society?
 
Consumerism, or the focus on consuming goods and services, is a central aspect of many modern societies. However, there is a view that consumerism is more of a curse than a blessing, as it can lead to negative impacts on individuals, communities, and the environment. This view is often supported by the idea that consumerism can contribute to issues such as overconsumption, waste, and environmental degradation.
 
On one hand, there are several arguments in favor of the idea that consumerism is a curse. One argument is that consumerism can contribute to overconsumption and waste, as individuals may feel pressure to constantly acquire new goods and dispose of old ones. In addition, consumerism can have negative environmental impacts, as the production and disposal of goods often generates pollution and uses natural resources.
 
However, one argument is that consumerism can drive economic growth and create jobs, which can have positive impacts on individuals and communities. In addition, consumerism can provide individuals with access to a wide range of goods and services that can improve their quality of life.
 
In my view, while it is true that consumerism can have negative impacts on individuals, communities, and the environment, it is also important to recognize that it can have positive impacts as well. It is important to strike a balance between the benefits and drawbacks of consumerism, and to consider ways to mitigate the negative impacts of consumerism, such as through sustainable consumption practices and the implementation of regulations and policies to address issues such as pollution and waste.
 
In conclusion, while consumerism can have both positive and negative impacts on individuals, communities, and the environment, it is important to strike a balance between the benefits and drawbacks of consumerism and to consider ways to mitigate the negative impacts. This may involve implementing sustainable consumption practices and regulations and policies to address issues such as pollution and waste.
 
 
11. Consider the view that mathematics is of little interest to most people as it is too complex.
 
There is a view that mathematics is of little interest to most people, as it is seen as a complex and abstract subject that is difficult to understand and apply to real-world situations. This view is often supported by the idea that mathematics can be intimidating or overwhelming for many people, and that it is not seen as relevant or useful to their everyday lives.
 
On one hand, there are several arguments in favor of the idea that mathematics is of little interest to most people. One argument is that mathematics can be challenging and requires a high level of abstract thinking and problem-solving skills, which may not be appealing to everyone. In addition, many people may not see the practical value or relevance of mathematics to their everyday lives, and may therefore not be motivated to learn about it.
 
However, one argument is that mathematics is a fundamental and pervasive aspect of the world around us, and that it is important for understanding and engaging with a wide range of disciplines and fields, including science, engineering, finance, and more. In addition, mathematics can provide a sense of accomplishment and personal growth to those who engage with it and develop their skills.
 
In my view, while it is true that mathematics can be complex and challenging, it is also important to recognize the value and relevance of mathematics to a wide range of disciplines and fields, as well as the personal growth and sense of accomplishment that it can provide to those who engage with it. It is important to approach mathematics with an open mind and to consider the diverse ways in which it can be useful and meaningful in our lives.
 
One example of the practical value and relevance of mathematics is its use in data analysis and machine learning, which have become increasingly important in fields such as business, healthcare, and technology. These applications of mathematics allow for the interpretation and analysis of large amounts of data, and have the potential to improve decision-making and drive innovation.
 
In conclusion, while mathematics can be complex and challenging, it is important to recognize the value and relevance of mathematics to a wide range of disciplines and fields, as well as the personal growth and sense of accomplishment that it can provide to those who engage with it. It is important to approach mathematics with an open mind and to consider the diverse ways in which it can be useful and meaningful in our lives.
 
 
12. It is not winning, but taking part, which matters. How acceptable is this as an approach to life?
 
There is a view that it is not winning, but taking part, which matters in life, and that this approach should be valued and encouraged. This view is often supported by the idea that the process of participating and striving for personal improvement is more important than achieving external recognition or success.
 
On one hand, there are several arguments in favor of the idea that taking part is more important than winning. One argument is that participating in activities and endeavors can provide personal growth and development, regardless of the outcome. In addition, focusing on the process of taking part can encourage a growth mindset and a commitment to improvement, rather than a fixed mindset and a focus on external validation.
 
However, one argument is that competition and the desire to achieve success can be motivating and can drive individuals to push themselves and strive for excellence. In addition, external recognition and success can bring tangible benefits, such as financial rewards or career advancement.
 
In my view, while it is important to recognize the value of participating and striving for personal improvement, it is also important to recognize the role that competition and the desire for success can play in motivating individuals and driving excellence. It is important to strike a balance between these two approaches and to recognize that both can have value in different contexts.
 
An example of the importance of taking part and striving for personal improvement is the concept of “kaizen,” which is a Japanese business philosophy that emphasizes continuous improvement. This philosophy encourages individuals to focus on the process of taking part and striving for personal improvement, rather than achieving external success or recognition.
 
In conclusion, while taking part and striving for personal improvement are important values to encourage, it is also important to recognize the role that competition and the desire for success can play in motivating individuals and driving excellence. It is important to strike a balance between these two approaches and to recognize that both can have value in different contexts.
 
 

GP A Level 2021 Questions

 
1. How far is the pursuit of happiness the most important human goal?
 
The pursuit of happiness has long been considered a fundamental human goal, with many people striving to achieve happiness in their personal and professional lives. This pursuit can take many forms, such as seeking out fulfilling relationships, engaging in meaningful work, or participating in activities that bring joy and satisfaction. In some cases, people may even prioritize their own happiness over other values or goals, such as financial success or personal ambition.
 
There are a number of arguments in favor of the idea that the pursuit of happiness is the most important human goal. For one, happiness is often seen as a key indicator of well-being and quality of life. When people are happy, they tend to be more productive, more resilient, and better able to handle life’s challenges. In addition, happiness can have a ripple effect, spreading positivity and joy to others and contributing to the overall happiness of society.
 
However, it is worth considering that the pursuit of happiness is not the only important human goal, and it may not always be the most important one in every situation. For example, there may be times when other values, such as integrity, honesty, or compassion, take precedence over happiness. In addition, the pursuit of happiness can sometimes lead to negative consequences, such as when it is pursued at the expense of other values or when it becomes an obsession.
 
In conclusion, while the pursuit of happiness is an important human goal, it is not the only one and may not always be the most important. It is important to strike a balance and consider the potential trade-offs and consequences of prioritizing happiness over other values or goals.
 
 
2. Scientific advancement breeds complacency. How far do you agree?
 
It could be argued that scientific advancement has led to a certain degree of complacency in society, as people have come to rely on technology and scientific discoveries to solve problems and make their lives easier. For example, the proliferation of smartphones and other devices has made it easier for people to access information and communicate with one another, potentially leading to a lack of motivation to think critically and solve problems on one’s own.
 
On the other hand, it could also be argued that scientific advancement has had the opposite effect, as it has led to a constant need for innovation and progress. The rapid pace of technological advancement has created a competitive environment in which companies and individuals are constantly striving to outdo one another and come up with new and better solutions to problems.
 
Ultimately, the extent to which scientific advancement breeds complacency is likely to depend on the specific context and the way in which it is used. While it is true that scientific advancement can lead to a certain degree of reliance on technology, it can also serve as a driving force for innovation and progress.
 
 
3. Power these days lies more with the people than the politicians. To what extent is this true?
 
It could be argued that power in today’s society lies more with the people than with politicians, as the proliferation of social media and other forms of communication has given individuals a greater platform to voice their opinions and influence decision-making processes. For example, social media campaigns and online petitions have been successful in raising awareness and bringing about change on a variety of issues, such as climate change and human rights violations.
 
On the other hand, it could also be argued that politicians still hold a significant amount of power in today’s society. They are often the ones responsible for making laws and policies that affect the lives of citizens, and they have access to resources and networks that can help them shape public opinion and influence decision-making processes. Additionally, the media, which plays a significant role in shaping public discourse, is often controlled by a small group of influential individuals, giving them the power to shape the narrative and influence public opinion.
 
Overall, it seems that power in today’s society is distributed among a variety of different actors, including politicians, individuals, and various interest groups. While individuals may have a greater ability to influence decision-making processes through the use of social media and other forms of communication, politicians and other powerful actors still hold a significant amount of power and are able to shape the direction of society in many ways.
 
 
4. To what extent has social media devalued true friendship in your society?
 
In recent years, social media has become an integral part of our daily lives, allowing us to connect with others and share information and experiences instantly. However, it has also raised concerns about the impact it has on the quality of our relationships.
 
One example of this is the ease with which we can add and remove people from our social media circles. It has become common for people to have large numbers of “friends” on platforms like Facebook, many of whom they may not have met in person or had minimal interactions with. This can create a sense of superficiality in our relationships, as we may not truly know or understand these individuals.
 
On the other hand, social media can also be used to strengthen and maintain long-distance friendships. It allows us to keep in touch with people we care about, even when we are physically separated. It can also be a way for shy or introverted individuals to connect with others and build relationships that may not have formed in real life.
 
Overall, I believe that social media has the potential to both enhance and devalue friendship, depending on how it is used. While it can be a convenient way to stay connected with others, it is important to also make an effort to foster in-person connections and maintain a balance between our online and offline relationships.
 
In conclusion, while social media has brought many benefits to our society, it is important to be mindful of its potential to devalue true friendship. It is up to each individual to use social media in a way that enhances and strengthens their relationships, rather than replacing them with shallow connections.
 
 
5. To what extent is charitable giving desirable?
 
It is generally agreed upon that charitable giving is a desirable act, as it helps to address societal issues and provide aid to those in need. Charitable giving can take various forms, including monetary donations, volunteering time and resources, and participating in fundraising events.
 
An example of the positive impact of charitable giving is the ability to provide basic necessities such as food, shelter, and healthcare to individuals and communities in need. This can help to alleviate suffering and improve the overall quality of life for those who are struggling. Charitable giving can also support causes that are important to individuals and communities, such as education, the environment, and animal welfare.
 
However, it is important to ensure that charitable giving is done in a responsible and transparent manner. This includes thoroughly researching the organization or cause being supported, and being aware of any potential issues such as mismanagement of funds or lack of accountability.
 
In conclusion, charitable giving can bring about significant benefits to those in need and to society as a whole. It is important to approach charitable giving with thoughtfulness and care in order to maximize its positive impact.
 
 
6. Films are concerned with escaping from the problems of everyday life, rather than addressing them. Discuss.
 
It could be argued that films, like many forms of entertainment, serve as a means of escapism for audiences, allowing them to temporarily forget about the problems and stresses of everyday life. Many films focus on fantastical or unrealistic scenarios and offer a sense of adventure and excitement that may be lacking in real life.
 
On the other hand, it could also be argued that films can serve as a means of addressing and exploring the problems of everyday life. Many films tackle social and political issues and can serve as a platform for discussing and raising awareness about important topics. In addition, films can serve as a means of catharsis for audiences, allowing them to process and understand their own problems and emotions in a safe and controlled environment.
 
Ultimately, the extent to which films are concerned with escaping from or addressing the problems of everyday life is likely to vary depending on the specific film in question. While some films may offer a purely escapist experience, others may delve deeper into important social and personal issues.
 
 
7. What an individual eats or drinks should not be the concern of the state. What is your view?
 
In general, it can be argued that an individual’s food and beverage choices should not be the concern of the state. Personal dietary choices are a matter of personal autonomy and freedom of choice, and it is generally not the role of the state to dictate what individuals should or should not consume.
 
There are, however, situations in which the state may have a legitimate interest in regulating food and beverage choices. For example, the state may regulate food safety to protect the public from contaminated or unsafe products. In addition, the state may regulate the marketing of certain products, particularly those that are targeted at children, in order to protect public health.
 
On the other hand, some may argue that the state has a responsibility to promote healthy eating habits and to regulate certain products, such as sugary drinks or unhealthy snacks, in order to address issues such as obesity and related health problems. In these cases, it could be argued that the state has a legitimate interest in regulating food and beverage choices in order to protect public health.
 
Ultimately, the extent to which the state should be involved in regulating food and beverage choices is a matter of debate. While personal autonomy and freedom of choice are important considerations, there may also be legitimate public health concerns that justify state intervention in some cases.
 
 
8. Is news today reliable?
 
It is a common concern that news today is not always reliable, and that it is increasingly difficult to know what to believe. With the proliferation of news sources, both traditional and digital, it can be challenging to determine which sources are credible and which are not. In addition, the speed at which news is reported and disseminated can sometimes lead to the spread of misinformation, whether intentional or not.
 
There are certainly examples of news that has proven to be unreliable or misleading. For example, news sources may intentionally disseminate false or biased information in order to advance a particular agenda or to attract readers or viewers. In other cases, news may be reported without proper fact-checking or context, leading to the spread of misinformation.
 
However, it is also important to recognize that there are many reliable news sources that strive to report accurate and fair information. These sources may employ fact-checkers and use multiple sources to verify the accuracy of their reporting. In addition, there are a number of organizations and initiatives that work to promote media literacy and help individuals to evaluate the reliability of news sources.
 
In conclusion, while it is certainly true that news today is not always reliable, it is also important to recognize that there are many credible sources of news that work to report accurate and fair information. It is important for individuals to be media literate and to evaluate the reliability of news sources in order to make informed decisions.
 
 
9. The arts are nothing more than a luxury. How far is this true of your society?
 
It is often argued that the arts are nothing more than a luxury, and that they serve little purpose beyond providing entertainment and enjoyment for those who can afford them. This argument suggests that resources invested in the arts could be better used elsewhere, and that the arts are not essential to the functioning of society.
 
There are certainly some valid points to this argument. The arts can be expensive, and may not always be accessible to everyone. In addition, the arts may not have a direct, tangible impact on issues like healthcare, education, or economic development, which are often seen as more pressing priorities.
 
However, it is also important to consider that the arts can bring a number of benefits to society. The arts can have a positive impact on mental health and wellbeing, and can provide a sense of connection and community. They can also be a powerful means of expression and communication, and can help to promote cultural understanding and tolerance. In addition, the arts can contribute to the economy, through things like job creation and tourism.
 
In conclusion, while it is true that the arts may not always be a priority in society, and that they can be expensive and may not always be accessible to everyone, it is key to consider the benefits that the arts can bring. While it is important to allocate resources responsibly and to prioritize the needs of the community, it is also important to recognize the value that the arts can bring to society, and to ensure that they are not overlooked or underfunded.
 
 
10. Staging major sporting events brings nothing but benefits to the host countries. Discuss.
 
It is often argued that hosting major sporting events brings nothing but benefits to the host countries. This argument suggests that hosting events like the Olympics, World Cup, or Commonwealth Games can bring economic, social, and cultural benefits to the host countries, and that the costs associated with hosting these events are justified.
 
There are certainly some valid points to this argument. Major sporting events can bring significant economic benefits to the host countries, through things like increased tourism, infrastructure development, and job creation. These events can also provide a sense of national pride and unity, as well as opportunities for cultural exchange and intercultural understanding.
 
However, it is also important to consider that hosting major sporting events can also bring a number of challenges and costs. These events can be expensive to host, with costs often running into billions of dollars. In addition, there can be negative impacts on the host countries, such as environmental degradation, social displacement, and financial burdens on local residents. There are also concerns about the extent to which the economic benefits of these events are fairly distributed, and whether they are sustainable in the long term.
 
In conclusion, while it is true that hosting major sporting events can bring economic, social, and cultural benefits to the host countries, it is also important to consider the costs and challenges associated with these events. While hosting these events can be a valuable opportunity for countries to showcase their strengths and capabilities, it is important to ensure that the benefits are balanced against the costs, and that the impacts on local communities are taken into account.
 
 
11. Are global tourism and travel still necessary when everything can be experienced or achieved online?
 
It is often suggested that global tourism and travel are no longer necessary in the age of the internet, as people can experience and achieve many things online. This argument suggests that with advances in technology, people can access a wide range of cultural, educational, and recreational opportunities from the comfort of their own homes, without the need to physically travel.
 
There are certainly some valid points to this argument. The internet has made it easier for people to access information, communicate with others, and participate in activities that were once only available through travel. For example, people can now watch live concerts, attend virtual museum exhibits, and even go on virtual tours of far-off destinations, all without leaving their homes.
 
However, it is also worth considering that global tourism and travel offer a number of benefits that cannot be fully replicated online. Travel can provide people with the opportunity to experience new cultures, meet new people, and gain new perspectives in ways that are not possible through digital means. In addition, travel can have a number of personal and social benefits, such as improving mental health, fostering relationships, and promoting intercultural understanding.
 
In conclusion, while the internet has made it easier for people to experience and achieve many things without the need for travel, global tourism and travel still have a number of unique and valuable benefits. While it may be possible to replicate some aspects of travel online, it cannot fully replace the experience of physically exploring and experiencing new places and cultures.
 
 
12. Advertising is largely about persuading people to buy what they do not need. How far do you agree?
 
It is often argued that advertising is primarily focused on persuading people to buy products or services that they do not necessarily need. This argument suggests that advertising plays on people’s emotions, desires, and insecurities in order to convince them to make purchases that they might not have otherwise considered.
 
There is some evidence to support this view. Many advertisements are designed to appeal to consumers’ emotional or aspirational needs, rather than their practical or functional ones. For example, an advertisement for a luxury car might appeal to a person’s desire for status or success, rather than their need for transportation. In this way, advertising can create a sense of need or desire for products that might not be necessary for a person’s well-being or happiness.
 
However, it is also worth considering that advertising serves other purposes beyond persuasion. In many cases, advertising is used to inform consumers about the availability and features of products, as well as to create brand awareness and loyalty. Advertising can also be used to promote causes or social issues, such as environmental sustainability or social justice.
 
In conclusion, while it is true that advertising often seeks to persuade people to buy products or services that they do not necessarily need, it is not the only purpose of advertising. Advertising can also serve to inform and educate consumers, as well as to promote social causes and values.
 
 

GP A Level 2020 Questions

1. How reliable are statistics as a guide for planning the future?
 
Statistics can be a very useful tool for planning the future, as they allow us to make informed decisions based on data and evidence. However, there are also limitations to the use of statistics, and it is important to consider these limitations when using statistics as a guide for planning.
 
On the one hand, statistics can be a reliable guide for planning because they are based on empirical data. This means that the results are based on observations or measurements of real-world phenomena, rather than being based on opinions or subjective beliefs. This makes statistics a powerful tool for understanding trends, patterns, and relationships in data.
 
For example, consider a study on the effectiveness of a new drug. If the study is based on a large sample of patients and is conducted using rigorous methods, the results are likely to be reliable and can be used to guide decision-making about the use of the drug. Similarly, statistical analysis of economic data can help policymakers and business leaders make informed decisions about investments, hiring, and other important business decisions.
 
On the other hand, there are limitations to the use of statistics that should be considered when using them as a guide for planning. One key limitation is the sample size. The larger the sample size, the more reliable the statistics are likely to be. However, it is often not practical or possible to collect data from a very large sample, and small sample sizes can lead to results that are not representative of the population as a whole.
 
Another limitation is bias. Bias can occur when the sample is self-selected (such as when people volunteer to participate in a study), or when the data are collected using a biased method (such as a survey that only reaches people with internet access). Bias can lead to inaccurate or misleading results, so it is important to consider whether it is present when using statistics as a guide for planning.
 
Finally, it is important to consider the context in which the statistics are being used. For example, if you are using statistics to predict future trends, you should consider factors such as economic conditions, technological developments, and social changes that may affect the results.
 
In conclusion, while statistics can be a very useful tool for planning the future, it is important to use them carefully and to consider their limitations. By considering factors such as sample size, bias, and context, we can ensure that the statistics we use are reliable and accurate, and can help us make informed decisions.
 
 
2. To what extent is human life in general about the survival of the fittest?
 
The phrase “survival of the fittest” is often used to describe the idea that in nature, only the strongest and most adaptable organisms are able to survive and reproduce. This concept is often associated with the theory of evolution by natural selection, which suggests that over time, species evolve and adapt in response to their environment and the pressures of survival.
 
However, the extent to which human life is about the survival of the fittest is a more complex and controversial question. On the one hand, it is undeniable that in many situations, human beings must struggle to survive and to thrive in a competitive world. For example, in some societies, individuals must compete for resources such as food, shelter, and job opportunities. In these situations, those who are able to adapt and to overcome challenges may be more likely to succeed and to thrive.
 
On the other hand, there are also many factors that can influence human survival and success that go beyond simple physical strength and adaptability. For example, access to education, healthcare, and social support can all play a significant role in determining an individual’s chances of survival and success. In addition, social and cultural factors such as race, gender, and class can also have a significant impact on an individual’s opportunities and outcomes.
 
In conclusion, while the survival of the fittest is certainly a factor in human life, it is by no means the only factor. There are many other factors that influence an individual’s chances of survival and success, including access to resources, education, healthcare, and social support, as well as social and cultural factors. It is important to recognize and address these factors in order to promote a more equitable and just society.
 
 
3. Individuals achieve sporting success, not nations. Discuss.
 
It is often said that sporting success is achieved by individuals, rather than by nations. This argument can be supported by several points.
 
First and foremost, sporting success is ultimately the result of the hard work, talent, and dedication of individual athletes. While national teams and organizations may provide support and resources for athletes, it is the athletes themselves who put in the time and effort to train and compete at the highest levels. For example, consider the success of Usain Bolt, who is widely considered one of the greatest sprinters of all time. Bolt’s success was due to his own natural talent, as well as his hard work and dedication to his sport.
 
Second, sporting success is not always correlated with the wealth or power of a nation. While it is true that some nations may have more resources and support for their athletes, this is not always a determining factor in sporting success. For example, smaller and less wealthy nations such as Jamaica and Kenya have had significant success in track and field events, despite having fewer resources than larger and wealthier nations.
 
Finally, it is important to recognize that sporting success is not always measured in terms of medals or trophies. For some athletes, personal accomplishments and personal bests may be just as meaningful as winning a major championship. In these cases, the focus is on the individual athlete’s achievements, rather than on the achievements of the nation as a whole.
 
In conclusion, while national teams and organizations may provide support and resources for athletes, sporting success is ultimately the result of the hard work, talent, and dedication of individual athletes. While some factors such as resources and support may play a role, there are many other factors that contribute to an individual’s sporting success, including natural talent, hard work, and dedication to the sport.
 
 
4. We shape our buildings, but then our buildings shape us. To what extent is this true of your society?
 
It is often said that “we shape our buildings, but then our buildings shape us.” This statement suggests that the built environment has a significant impact on the people who live and work in it.
 
There is no doubt that the built environment plays a significant role in shaping our lives and our experiences. The design and layout of our homes, schools, workplaces, and public spaces can all have a major impact on how we live and interact with each other. For example, consider the impact of high-rise apartment buildings on the way people live and socialize. These buildings may offer convenient and efficient housing, but they may also limit opportunities for social interaction and community building, as residents are often isolated from each other in their individual units.
 
On the other hand, it is important to recognize that the relationship between people and their built environment is complex and multifaceted. While the built environment can shape our experiences and behaviors, it is also shaped by the needs, values, and preferences of the people who use it. For example, the design of a public park may be influenced by the needs and preferences of the community it serves, such as the desire for open space, playgrounds, or picnic areas.
 
In conclusion, it is true that the built environment has a significant impact on the people who live and work in it. However, it is also important to recognize that this relationship is bidirectional, and that the built environment is shaped by the needs, values, and preferences of the people who use it. By considering the needs and preferences of the community and by designing the built environment in a way that promotes social interaction and well-being, we can create spaces that support and enrich our lives.
 
 
5. To what extent can any society claim to be great?
 
The concept of a “great society” is a subjective one, and different people and groups may have different criteria for what makes a society great. However, there are several key factors that are often cited as important elements of a great society. These factors include economic prosperity, social justice and equality, cultural diversity and tolerance, and a strong sense of community and social connection.
 
In terms of economic prosperity, a great society is one that provides opportunities for its citizens to thrive and to achieve economic success. This may include factors such as a strong and stable economy, access to education and job training, and support for small businesses and entrepreneurship.
 
Social justice and equality are also important elements of a great society. This includes ensuring that all members of society have equal opportunities to succeed and to participate in the social, political, and economic life of the community. It also means addressing issues such as poverty, discrimination, and inequality, and ensuring that all members of society have access to the resources and support they need to thrive.
 
Cultural diversity and tolerance are also essential elements of a great society. This means valuing and celebrating the cultural differences and traditions of all members of the community, and promoting an inclusive and welcoming environment for people of all backgrounds and identities.
 
Finally, a strong sense of community and social connection is also important for a great society. This includes fostering a sense of belonging and connection among members of the community, and promoting opportunities for social interaction and collaboration.
 
In conclusion, while it is difficult to define a great society in absolute terms, there are several key factors that are often cited as important elements of a great society. These include economic prosperity, social justice and equality, cultural diversity and tolerance, and a strong sense of community and social connection. By focusing on these factors, societies can work towards becoming great places to live and thrive.
 
 
6. Examine the view that the scientist is concerned only with knowledge, not morality.
 
The question of whether scientists are primarily concerned with knowledge or morality is a complex and controversial one. Some argue that the pursuit of scientific truth requires a single-minded focus on knowledge, and that ethical considerations are largely irrelevant. Others, however, believe that scientists have a moral responsibility to consider the potential impacts of their work on society and to ensure that their research is conducted in an ethical and responsible manner. In this essay, we will examine the view that the scientist is concerned only with knowledge, not morality, and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of this argument.
 
One argument in support of the view that scientists are concerned only with knowledge is the idea that the pursuit of scientific truth requires a certain degree of objectivity. In order to uncover the facts of the matter, scientists must be willing to follow the evidence wherever it leads, even if this means challenging long-held beliefs or the status quo. This requires a focus on the facts, rather than on personal or moral considerations.
 
Another reason why some may argue that scientists are not concerned with morality is the fact that science operates according to a set of rules and principles that are designed to ensure the reliability and validity of research findings. These principles, such as the scientific method and peer review, are designed to minimize bias and subjectivity, and to ensure that scientific knowledge is based on solid evidence. As a result, it is argued that the pursuit of scientific truth requires a single-minded focus on the evidence, rather than on moral or ethical considerations.
 
While there are certainly valid arguments to be made in support of the view that scientists are concerned only with knowledge, not morality, it is also important to recognize that this perspective has its limitations. While it is true that the pursuit of scientific truth requires a certain degree of objectivity and a focus on the evidence, it is also the case that science has the potential to impact society in significant ways. As a result, it is important for scientists to consider the moral implications of their work and to ensure that their research is conducted in an ethical and responsible manner. Overall, while the pursuit of knowledge is certainly a central concern for scientists, it is not the only concern, and it is important to recognize the role that morality can and should play in the work of scientists.
 
 
7. Given greater levels of international cooperation, how necessary is it for countries to engage in the arms trade?
 
The arms trade, or the buying and selling of military equipment and weapons, has long been a controversial issue, with many questioning the necessity and ethics of such transactions. In recent years, there has been a push for greater international cooperation and the reduction of tensions between countries. Given this context, it is worth considering the question of whether countries still need to engage in the arms trade, or whether such activities are no longer necessary in a more cooperative and peaceful world.
 
One argument in favor of continuing the arms trade is the need for national security. Many countries argue that they have a responsibility to protect their citizens and their borders, and that the acquisition of military equipment is necessary for this purpose. In this view, the arms trade is seen as a necessary evil, a way for countries to ensure their own safety and defense against potential threats.
 
Another argument in favor of the arms trade is the economic benefits it can provide. The production and sale of military equipment can create jobs and stimulate economic growth, particularly for countries with a strong defense industry. In this way, the arms trade can be seen as a way for countries to improve their economic standing and increase their global influence.
 
However, there are also strong arguments against the arms trade. One concern is the potential for such transactions to fuel conflict and destabilize regions. The sale of weapons to countries with a history of aggression or human rights abuses can exacerbate existing tensions and lead to further violence. Additionally, the arms trade is often accompanied by corruption and illicit activities, such as the diversion of weapons to unauthorized parties or the use of profits to fund illegal activities.
 
Given the complex and often conflicting arguments surrounding the arms trade, it is difficult to reach a definitive conclusion on its necessity. While it is true that the acquisition of military equipment can provide a measure of national security and economic benefits, it is also the case that such transactions can have negative consequences, both for the countries involved and for international relations more broadly. In the current climate of increasing international cooperation, it may be worth considering alternative approaches to conflict resolution and the promotion of global peace and stability.
 
 
8. Should politicians pursue the popular viewpoint or their own convictions, if they conflict?
 
One of the fundamental roles of politicians is to represent the interests and values of their constituents. However, there are times when the popular viewpoint may conflict with the personal convictions of a politician. In such situations, it can be difficult for politicians to decide whether to follow the will of the people or to stand firm in their beliefs. In this essay, we will explore the question of whether politicians should pursue the popular viewpoint or their own convictions if they conflict, and consider the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches.
 
One argument in favor of politicians following their own convictions is the idea that they have been elected to serve as leaders, not simply as followers. In this view, it is the responsibility of politicians to use their judgment and expertise to make informed decisions, even if these decisions are not popular with the general public. By standing firm in their beliefs, politicians can provide a strong and consistent voice on important issues, and can serve as a moral compass for the country.
 
On the other hand, there is also a strong argument to be made in favor of politicians pursuing the popular viewpoint. After all, politicians are elected by the people, and it is their job to represent the will of the majority. In this view, it is important for politicians to listen to the concerns and opinions of their constituents and to take them into account when making decisions. By following the popular viewpoint, politicians can ensure that they are acting in the best interests of the people they serve.
 
Ultimately, the decision of whether to pursue the popular viewpoint or their own convictions is one that politicians must make on a case-by-case basis. While there are certainly times when it is important for politicians to stand firm in their beliefs and to provide strong leadership, there are also situations where it is more appropriate to follow the will of the people. The key is for politicians to strike a balance between these two approaches, and to be mindful of the impact of their decisions on both their constituents and the wider society.
 
 
9. Is modern technology a benefit or a threat to democracy?
 
In recent years, the rapid pace of technological development has had a profound impact on society and the way we live our lives. One area where technology has had a particularly significant impact is in the realm of politics and democracy. On the one hand, technology has the potential to facilitate greater participation and accessibility in the democratic process. On the other hand, there are also concerns that technology can be used to undermine democratic values and principles. In this essay, we will explore the question of whether modern technology is a benefit or a threat to democracy, and consider the strengths and weaknesses of both arguments.
 
One argument in favor of technology being a benefit to democracy is the idea that it can facilitate greater access and participation. The use of technology, such as online voting systems and social media platforms, can make it easier for people to engage with the political process and have their voices heard. Additionally, technology can be used to facilitate more open and transparent government, with tools such as open data portals and online transparency initiatives making it easier for citizens to hold politicians accountable.
 
However, there are also valid concerns about the potential negative impacts of technology on democracy. One concern is the issue of online disinformation and propaganda, which can be spread quickly and easily through social media and other online platforms. This can have the effect of polarizing public opinion and undermining the integrity of the democratic process. Additionally, the use of advanced data analytics and targeted online advertising can be used to manipulate public opinion and sway election outcomes.
 
Overall, it is clear that modern technology has both the potential to be a benefit and a threat to democracy. While it is true that technology can facilitate greater participation and transparency in the political process, it is also the case that it can be used to manipulate and undermine democratic values. The key is for policymakers and citizens to be mindful of these potential negative impacts, and to take steps to ensure that technology is used in a way that supports, rather than undermines, democratic principles.
 
 
10. An appreciation of music is vital for a fully rounded education. How true is this of your society?
 
The role of music in education has long been a subject of debate, with some arguing that an appreciation of music is vital for a fully rounded education, while others see it as a non-essential or even frivolous pursuit. In this essay, we will explore the question of whether an appreciation of music is indeed vital for a fully rounded education, and consider how this view holds up in the context of your society.
 
There are several arguments in favor of music being an essential part of education. One reason is that music has the ability to foster creativity and self-expression. Through the study of music, students can learn to express themselves in new and imaginative ways, and to think creatively about the world around them. Additionally, music has been shown to have a range of cognitive benefits, including improving memory and concentration, and helping to develop important skills such as problem-solving and critical thinking.
 
Another argument in favor of music education is that it can help to promote cultural understanding and appreciation. Through the study of music from different cultures and historical periods, students can gain a greater understanding of the diverse societies and traditions that make up the world. In this way, music education can help to foster a sense of global citizenship and promote cross-cultural understanding and cooperation.
 
However, it is important to recognize that the value of music education is not universal, and that it may not be seen as essential in all societies. In some cultures, music may be seen as a less important or even non-essential aspect of education, and resources and time may be allocated accordingly. Additionally, there may be other factors, such as financial constraints or limited access to music education programs, that can impact the extent to which music is valued and included in the educational curriculum.
 
Overall, it is clear that music can play a valuable role in education, and that it has the potential to foster creativity, critical thinking, and cultural understanding. While it is true that the importance of music education may vary from society to society, it is ultimately up to individuals and communities to decide whether it is a vital part of a fully rounded education. Regardless of whether music is seen as essential or non-essential, it is important to recognize and appreciate the many benefits it can offer to students and to society as a whole.
 
 
11. In a free society, there should be no restrictions on freedom of speech. Discuss.
 
The freedom of speech is a cornerstone of democratic societies, and is often seen as a fundamental human right. However, there are also those who argue that in a free society, there should be no restrictions on freedom of speech, regardless of the consequences or impacts of such speech. In this essay, we will explore the question of whether there should be any restrictions on freedom of speech in a free society, and consider the strengths and weaknesses of both arguments.
 
One argument in favor of unrestricted freedom of speech is the idea that such freedom is necessary for the free exchange of ideas and the maintenance of an open and democratic society. Without the ability to speak freely, it is argued, individuals may be silenced or oppressed, and important ideas and perspectives may be suppressed. In this view, the freedom of speech is seen as a fundamental right that must be protected at all costs.
 
Another argument in favor of unrestricted freedom of speech is that any attempts to regulate or restrict such speech can lead to abuses of power and the suppression of legitimate expression. In this view, the freedom of speech should be absolute, and any attempts to regulate it, no matter how well-intentioned, are inherently dangerous and should be avoided.
 
However, there are also valid arguments against the idea of unrestricted freedom of speech. One concern is that some forms of speech, such as hate speech or incitement to violence, can have harmful and dangerous consequences. In such cases, it may be necessary to impose some restrictions on freedom of speech in order to protect the safety and well-being of individuals and society as a whole. Additionally, there may be other considerations, such as privacy or national security, that justify the imposition of certain limits on freedom of speech.
 
Overall, it is clear that the freedom of speech is a fundamental right that is essential to the maintenance of a free and democratic society. However, it is also important to recognize that this freedom is not absolute, and that there may be circumstances where it is necessary to impose certain restrictions in order to protect the safety and well-being of individuals and society. The key is to find a balance between the protection of free speech and the need to regulate certain forms of expression that may have harmful consequences.
 
 
12. How far can prosperity and uncontrolled population growth go hand in hand?
 
The relationship between prosperity and population growth is a complex and often controversial one. On the one hand, it is generally accepted that a growing population can contribute to economic prosperity, through the creation of new jobs and the expansion of consumer markets. On the other hand, there are also concerns about the potential negative impacts of uncontrolled population growth, including resource depletion and environmental degradation. In this essay, we will explore the question of how far prosperity and uncontrolled population growth can go hand in hand, and consider the strengths and weaknesses of both arguments.
 
One argument in favor of prosperity and population growth going hand in hand is the idea that a growing population can drive economic growth and development. As the population increases, there is a greater demand for goods and services, which can create new job opportunities and stimulate economic activity. Additionally, a larger population can provide a larger pool of talent and resources, which can help to drive innovation and competitiveness.
 
However, there are also valid concerns about the negative impacts of uncontrolled population growth. One concern is the issue of resource depletion, as a larger population will require more resources to sustain itself, which can lead to environmental degradation and resource shortages. Additionally, uncontrolled population growth can put pressure on infrastructure and public services, such as healthcare and education, which can have negative impacts on quality of life and social cohesion.
 
Overall, it is clear that prosperity and population growth can go hand in hand to a certain extent, as a growing population can contribute to economic growth and development. However, it is also important to recognize that there are limits to this relationship, and that uncontrolled population growth can have negative consequences. In order to ensure long-term prosperity and sustainability, it is necessary for societies to carefully manage population growth and to consider the impact of such growth on the environment and on social and economic systems.
 
 

GP A Level 2019 Questions

1) How far should countries have relations with others whose human rights record is poor?
 
The question of how far countries should have relations with others whose human rights record is poor is a complex and controversial issue that has been debated by policymakers, human rights activists, and others for many years. There are compelling arguments on both sides of the issue, and ultimately, the decision of how to balance the benefits and drawbacks of such relations will depend on the specific context and circumstances of each case.
 
On one hand, some argue that countries should maintain or even strengthen their relations with others whose human rights record is poor in order to promote positive change and improve the lives of people living in those countries. This perspective often emphasizes the importance of dialogue and engagement as a means of promoting human rights and democratic values. For example, countries may engage in diplomacy, trade, or other forms of cooperation in an effort to encourage their partners to adopt more progressive policies and practices.
 
For example, the European Union has used its economic and political leverage to promote human rights and democracy in countries such as China, Russia, and Vietnam. By offering access to markets and other benefits, the EU has sought to encourage these countries to adopt more open and inclusive policies. While there is ongoing debate about the effectiveness of this approach, some argue that it has contributed to important reforms in areas such as labor rights, environmental protection, and access to information.
 
On the other hand, others argue that countries should distance themselves from others whose human rights record is poor in order to signal their opposition to such practices and to avoid legitimizing or enabling abusive regimes. This perspective often emphasizes the importance of upholding moral principles and standing in solidarity with marginalized and oppressed groups. For example, countries may choose to impose sanctions, restrict travel, or engage in other forms of pressure in an effort to isolate and isolate abusive regimes.
 
For example, the United States has imposed sanctions on countries such as Iran, North Korea, and Syria in an effort to hold them accountable for their human rights abuses and other forms of misconduct. While these sanctions have had mixed results, some argue that they have helped to raise awareness about human rights abuses and to exert pressure on abusive regimes to change their ways.
 
In conclusion, the question of how far countries should have relations with others whose human rights record is poor is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration of a range of factors. While there are compelling arguments on both sides, it is clear that there are no easy answers or one-size-fits-all solutions. Ultimately, the decision of how to balance the benefits and drawbacks of such relations will depend on the specific context and circumstances of each case. In making this decision, it may be helpful for countries to consider a range of factors, such as the nature and severity of the human rights abuses, the potential for positive change, the risks and costs of various courses of action, and the views and interests of affected parties. It may also be helpful for countries to work closely with other actors, such as international organizations, civil society groups, and other governments, to develop a coordinated and effective response.
 
 
Ultimately, the goal should be to pursue policies that are consistent with the values of human rights and democracy and that promote the well-being and dignity of all people, regardless of where they live. While this may not always be easy, it is a fundamental responsibility of all countries to promote and protect the human rights of their citizens and those of others.
2) To what extent should income equality be a goal in your society?
 
Income inequality, or the unequal distribution of income or wealth within a society, has been a persistent and controversial issue in many countries for many years. While some argue that income equality should be a high priority for societies, others argue that it is not a relevant or desirable goal. Ultimately, the extent to which income equality should be a goal in any given society will depend on a range of factors and will require careful consideration and debate.
 
On one hand, there are compelling arguments for why income equality should be a goal in society. One argument is that income inequality can have negative consequences for social cohesion and well-being. Research has shown that countries with higher levels of income inequality tend to have lower levels of social trust, higher levels of crime and violence, and lower levels of health and happiness. These negative outcomes may be due in part to the fact that income inequality can lead to feelings of unfairness, resentment, and social isolation among those who are disadvantaged.
 
Another argument in favor of income equality is that it can promote economic stability and growth. Studies have shown that countries with more equal distributions of income tend to have more sustainable and resilient economies, with lower levels of debt, lower levels of corruption, and higher levels of innovation and productivity. This may be because income inequality can lead to imbalances in demand and consumption, as well as to the misallocation of resources and talent.
 
One example of a society that has made significant efforts to reduce income inequality is Sweden. Sweden has a long history of social welfare policies and progressive taxation, which have helped to narrow the gap between the rich and the poor. As a result, Sweden has one of the most equal distributions of income among developed countries. According to data from the World Bank, the Gini coefficient (a measure of income inequality) in Sweden was 25.1 in 2019, compared to 41.5 in the United States.
 
On the other hand, there are also compelling arguments for why income equality may not be a desirable goal in society. One argument is that income inequality can be a natural and necessary aspect of a healthy and dynamic economy. Some argue that income inequality can be a source of motivation and reward for hard work and innovation, and that it can help to allocate resources and opportunities in a way that is efficient and beneficial to society as a whole.
 
Another argument against income equality is that it can be difficult or impossible to achieve in practice. Some argue that it is not realistic or fair to try to equalize the outcomes of individuals or groups who have different levels of education, skills, talents, or circumstances. Moreover, some argue that efforts to reduce income inequality can have unintended consequences, such as reducing economic growth, stifling innovation, or undermining individual freedom and responsibility.
 
In conclusion, the extent to which income equality should be a goal in any given society is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration and debate. While there are compelling arguments for and against income equality, it is clear that there are no easy answers or one-size-fits-all solutions. Ultimately, the decision of how to balance the benefits and drawbacks of income equality will depend on the specific context and circumstances of each society.
 
 
3) Science is the only answer to global hunger. Discuss.
 
The claim that science is the only answer to global hunger is a controversial and debated topic. While it is certainly true that science and technology have made important contributions to addressing the issue of global hunger, it is also important to recognize that this problem is complex and multifaceted, and that other factors such as economic, political, and social policies also play a significant role.
 
On one hand, it is undeniable that science and technology have made important contributions to addressing global hunger. For example, advances in agriculture and food production have helped to increase crop yields, reduce losses due to pests and diseases, and improve the nutritional value of foods. In addition, advances in transportation and storage have helped to improve the distribution and availability of food in many parts of the world.
 
One example of how science and technology have helped to address global hunger is the development of genetically modified crops. These crops have been genetically modified to be resistant to pests, diseases, and environmental stress, which has helped to increase crop yields and reduce losses. According to the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, genetically modified crops have contributed to an increase in global food production of around 22% between 1996 and 2015.
 
On the other hand, it is important to recognize that science is not the only answer to global hunger. Other factors such as economic, political, and social policies also play a significant role in addressing this issue. For example, poverty, conflict, and economic instability can all contribute to food insecurity and malnutrition. To address these root causes, it may be necessary to implement policies such as economic development, trade, and peacebuilding, in addition to technological solutions.
 
In conclusion, while science and technology have made important contributions to addressing global hunger, it is important to recognize that this is a complex and multifaceted problem that requires a range of approaches and solutions. While science may be a key part of the solution, it is not the only answer, and it will be necessary to address the economic, political, and social factors that contribute to food insecurity and malnutrition.
 
 
4) Consider the view that social media has more influence than politicians.
 
The view that social media has more influence than politicians is a controversial and debated topic. While it is true that social media platforms have played an increasingly important role in shaping public discourse and opinion, it is also important to recognize that politicians and other traditional sources of power and influence have not been completely eclipsed by social media.
 
On one hand, it is undeniable that social media has had a significant impact on politics and society. With the rise of platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, individuals and groups have been able to mobilize and organize more easily, and to reach larger audiences than ever before. Social media has also given rise to a new generation of influencers and activists who have been able to use their platforms to promote causes and agendas, and to challenge the dominance of traditional sources of power and authority.
 
An example of how social media has had more influence than politicians is the role it played in the Arab Spring uprisings. In countries such as Tunisia, Egypt, and Bahrain, social media platforms were used to organize and mobilize protesters, and to spread information and propaganda in defiance of government censorship and control. While the role of social media in these events is still a matter of debate, it is clear that these platforms played an important role in shaping public opinion and catalyzing political change.
 
On the other hand, it is important to recognize that social media is not the only source of influence and power in politics and society. Traditional sources of power and authority, such as politicians, media outlets, and institutions, continue to hold significant sway over public opinion and policy. Moreover, social media is not a neutral or objective platform, and it can be shaped and manipulated by those who have the resources and expertise to do so.
 
In conclusion, while it is true that social media has had a significant impact on politics and society, it is important to recognize that it is not the only source of influence and power. Traditional sources of power and authority, such as politicians, media outlets, and institutions, continue to hold sway, and it is necessary to consider the
complex and multifaceted nature of the relationship between social media and politics in order to fully understand the impact of these platforms on society and democracy.
 
 
5) To what extent is artificial intelligence replacing the role of humans?
 
The question of to what extent artificial intelligence (AI) is replacing the role of humans is a complex and controversial issue that has been debated by policymakers, experts, and the general public for many years. While it is clear that AI has made significant advances in recent years and has the potential to transform many aspects of society and the economy, it is also important to recognize that the relationship between AI and humans is complex and multifaceted, and that the impact of AI on the role of humans will depend on a range of factors.
 
On one hand, it is undeniable that AI has made significant advances in recent years and has the potential to replace the role of humans in many areas. For example, AI algorithms and systems are being used to automate tasks and processes that were previously performed by humans, such as data analysis, customer service, and manufacturing. These advances have the potential to increase efficiency and productivity, but they also raise concerns about job displacement and the impact on workers.
 
One example of how AI is replacing the role of humans is the use of self-driving vehicles. These vehicles are equipped with sensors, cameras, and algorithms that allow them to navigate roads and traffic without the need for human input. While self-driving vehicles have the potential to reduce accidents and improve transportation efficiency, they also raise concerns about the impact on jobs, such as truck drivers, taxi drivers, and delivery workers.
 
On the other hand, it is important to recognize that the relationship between AI and humans is complex and multifaceted, and that the impact of AI on the role of humans will depend on a range of factors. For example, AI may complement rather than replace the role of humans in some cases, by enhancing human capabilities and freeing up time and resources for more complex and creative tasks. In addition, the extent to which AI will replace the role of humans will depend on how it is developed and deployed, as well as on the policies and regulations that are put in place to govern its use.
 
Another important factor to consider is the ethical and social implications of AI. As AI systems become more advanced and autonomous, there are concerns about the potential for bias and discrimination, as well as the impact on privacy and security. To address these concerns, it will be important to develop guidelines and principles for the responsible development and use of AI, and to ensure that the benefits of AI are shared fairly and equitably among all members of society.
 
In conclusion, the extent to which AI is replacing the role of humans is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration and debate. While it is clear that AI has made significant advances and has the potential to transform many aspects of society and the economy, it is also important to recognize that the relationship between AI and humans is complex and multifaceted, and that the impact of AI on the role of humans will depend on a range of factors. To ensure that the benefits of AI are shared fairly and equitably, it will be important to address the ethical and social implications of AI and to develop guidelines and principles for its responsible development and use.
 
 
6) A leader’s responsibility should always be to his or her own country, not other nations. Discuss.
 
The question of whether a leader’s responsibility should always be to his or her own country, rather than other nations, is a complex and controversial issue that has been debated by policymakers, experts, and the general public for many years. While it is understandable that leaders may feel a sense of loyalty and responsibility to their own citizens and countries, it is also important to recognize that the world is interconnected and interdependent, and that the actions of one country can have significant impacts on others.
 
On one hand, it is undeniable that leaders have a responsibility to prioritize the interests and well-being of their own citizens and countries. After all, leaders are elected or appointed to represent the interests of their constituents and to ensure that their countries are safe, prosperous, and secure. Leaders who fail to do so may risk losing the trust and support of their citizens, and may face consequences at the ballot box or in other forms of accountability.
 
One argument in favor of the view that a leader’s responsibility should always be to his or her own country is that leaders have limited resources and must make difficult choices about how to allocate those resources. For example, leaders may have to decide between investing in domestic programs and initiatives, or providing aid and assistance to other countries. In these cases, it may be necessary to prioritize the needs of one’s own citizens and country in order to ensure that they are being met.
 
On the other hand, it is important to recognize that the world is interconnected and interdependent, and that the actions of one country can have significant impacts on others. For example, the actions of one country may affect the global economy, the environment, or the security and stability of other countries. In these cases, it may be in the best interests of a leader’s own country to consider the needs and interests of other countries, in order to promote mutual cooperation and benefit.
 
For example, leaders may choose to provide aid and assistance to other countries in order to address humanitarian crises, or to prevent the spread of diseases such as HIV/AIDS or Ebola. In these cases, providing assistance to other countries may not only help to alleviate suffering and promote human rights, but it may also benefit one’s own country by reducing the risk of these problems spilling over and affecting one’s own citizens.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether a leader’s responsibility should always be to his or her own country, rather than other nations, is a complex and controversial issue that requires careful consideration and balance. While it is understandable that leaders may feel a sense of loyalty and responsibility to their own citizens and countries, it is also important to recognize that the world is interconnected and interdependent, and that the actions of one country can have significant impacts on others. In order to promote mutual cooperation and benefit, it may be necessary for leaders to consider the needs and interests of other countries in addition to their own.
 
 
7) Religion is an important part of the lives of young people today. Consider whether this is true in your society.
 
The question of whether religion is an important part of the lives of young people today is a complex and debated topic that varies depending on the society in question. In some societies, religion may be a central and influential part of the lives of young people, while in others it may be less important or even completely absent.
 
On one hand, it is undeniable that religion has played an important role in the lives of young people throughout history, and continues to do so in many societies today. For many young people, religion provides a sense of purpose, meaning, and belonging, and helps to shape their values, beliefs, and identity. Religion may also provide young people with a sense of community and support, and may offer them opportunities for spiritual and personal growth.
 
One example of how religion is an important part of the lives of young people today is the role it plays in providing a sense of meaning and purpose. Many young people may struggle to find a sense of meaning and purpose in a world that can be complex, confusing, and overwhelming. For these young people, religion may provide a sense of direction and guidance, and may help them to navigate the challenges and opportunities of life.
 
On the other hand, it is important to recognize that the role of religion in the lives of young people varies significantly depending on the society in question. In some societies, religion may be a central and influential part of the lives of young people, while in others it may be less important or even completely absent. The importance of religion in the lives of young people may also vary depending on factors such as education, culture, and social and economic status.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether religion is an important part of the lives of young people today is a complex and debated topic that varies depending on the society in question. While it is undeniable that religion has played an important role in the lives of young people throughout history, and continues to do so in many societies today, it is also important to recognize that the importance of religion in the lives of young people may vary depending on factors such as culture, education, and social and economic status. In order to fully understand the role of religion in the lives of young people today, it is necessary to consider the unique context and circumstances of each society.
 
 
8) Does violence in the visual media portray reality or encourage the unacceptable?
 
The question of whether violence in the visual media portrays reality or encourages the unacceptable is a complex and controversial issue that has been debated by policymakers, experts, and the general public for many years. While it is clear that the visual media, including television, movies, and video games, has the power to influence the beliefs and behavior of viewers, it is also important to recognize that the relationship between media violence and real-world violence is complex and multifaceted, and that the impact of media violence on individual and societal behavior will depend on a range of factors.
 
On one hand, it is undeniable that violence in the visual media portrays reality to some extent. Many television shows, movies, and video games depict violence and aggression as part of their storylines or themes, and these depictions may be based on real-world events or situations. Moreover, the visual media may also serve as a means of reporting on and documenting real-world violence and conflict, and may provide viewers with a glimpse into the experiences and perspectives of people affected by violence.
 
On the other hand, it is important to recognize that the visual media is not a completely accurate reflection of reality, and that the way violence is depicted in the media may be distorted or exaggerated. Media depictions of violence may be stylized or glamorized, and may not convey the full complexity and consequences of real-world violence. Moreover, the visual media may also present a biased or distorted view of violence, depending on the perspectives and agendas of the creators and producers.
 
In addition, there is also a question of whether violence in the visual media encourages the unacceptable. Some argue that media violence may desensitize viewers to real-world violence, or may even increase aggression and violent behavior. Studies have shown that exposure to media violence can increase aggressive thoughts and behaviors in some individuals, particularly in children and adolescents. However, it is important to recognize that the impact of media violence on individual and societal behavior will depend on a range of factors, including the age and maturity of the viewer, the context in which the media is consumed, and the presence of other mitigating or exacerbating influences.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether violence in the visual media portrays reality or encourages the unacceptable is a complex and controversial issue that requires careful consideration and debate. While it is clear that the visual media has the power to influence the beliefs and behavior of viewers, it is also important to recognize that the relationship between media violence and real-world violence is complex and multifaceted, and that the impact of media violence on individual and societal behavior will depend on a range of factors. To ensure that the visual media is used in responsible and constructive ways, it will be important to consider the ethical and social implications of media violence, and to develop guidelines and principles for its responsible portrayal and consumption.
 
 
9) Is globalisation to be welcomed or feared today?
 
The question of whether globalisation is to be welcomed or feared today is a complex and debated topic that has implications for a wide range of issues, including economic development, cultural exchange, and political relations. While it is clear that globalisation has brought about many benefits and opportunities, it is also important to recognize that it has also raised a number of challenges and concerns.
 
On one hand, it is undeniable that globalisation has brought about many benefits and opportunities. Globalisation refers to the increasing interconnectedness and interdependence of countries, businesses, and people around the world, and has been driven by advances in transportation, communication, and technology. As a result of globalisation, people and businesses have been able to access new markets, resources, and ideas, and to participate in a global economy that is more interconnected and dynamic than ever before.
 
An example of how globalisation has brought about benefits and opportunities is the way it has facilitated economic development and increased prosperity. Globalisation has allowed countries and businesses to tap into new markets and to access resources, labor, and capital that were previously unavailable. This has led to increased economic growth and development, and has helped to lift millions of people out of poverty.
 
On the other hand, it is important to recognize that globalisation has also raised a number of challenges and concerns. Some argue that globalisation has led to increased inequality and social unrest, as it has benefited some groups more than others. For example, globalisation has been accompanied by the outsourcing of jobs and the decline of certain industries, which has led to job losses and economic insecurity for many workers. Moreover, globalisation has also been accompanied by increased cultural exchange and the spread of Western values and practices, which has led to concerns about the erosion of traditional cultures and values.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether globalisation is to be welcomed or feared today is a complex and debated topic that has implications for a wide range of issues. While it is clear that globalisation has brought about many benefits and opportunities, it is also important to recognize that it has raised a number of challenges and concerns. To ensure that the benefits of globalisation are shared fairly and equitably, it will be important to address these challenges and concerns, and to develop policies and strategies that promote inclusive and sustainable development.
 
 
10) Should both parents take equal responsibility for raising their children?
 
The question of whether both parents should take equal responsibility for raising their children is a complex and controversial issue that has been debated by policymakers, experts, and the general public for many years. While it is clear that both parents play a critical role in the upbringing and development of their children, it is also important to recognize that the specific responsibilities and contributions of each parent will depend on a range of factors, including the individual circumstances of each family, and the values and beliefs of the parents.
 
On one hand, it is undeniable that both parents play a critical role in the upbringing and development of their children. Children rely on their parents for love, support, guidance, and nurturing, and both parents are responsible for providing these things. Moreover, both parents also play important roles in shaping the values, beliefs, and behaviors of their children, and in providing a positive and supportive environment for their children to grow and thrive.
 
One argument in favor of the view that both parents should take equal responsibility for raising their children is that children benefit from having two actively involved and supportive parents. Research has shown that children who have strong and positive relationships with both of their parents are more likely to be emotionally healthy, socially well-adjusted, and academically successful. Moreover, children who have two actively involved and supportive parents are also more likely to have a sense of security, stability, and self-esteem, and to be better prepared to navigate the challenges and opportunities of life.
 
On the other hand, it is important to recognize that the specific responsibilities and contributions of each parent will depend on a range of factors, including the individual circumstances of each family, and the values and beliefs of the parents. In some cases, one parent may be the primary caregiver, while the other parent may be more involved in other aspects of the child’s upbringing and development. In other cases, both parents may be equally involved in all aspects of the child’s upbringing and development. Ultimately, the most important thing is for both parents to be actively involved and supportive of their children, and to work together to provide a positive and nurturing environment for their children to grow and thrive.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether both parents should take equal responsibility for raising their children is a complex and controversial issue that requires careful consideration and balance. While it is clear that both parents play a critical role in the upbringing and development of their children, it is also important to recognize that the specific responsibilities and contributions of each parent will depend on a range of factors. To ensure that children receive the love, support, guidance, and nurturing they need, it is important for both parents to be actively involved and supportive of their children, and to work together to provide a positive and nurturing environment for their children to grow and thrive.
 
 
11) Assess the importance of food within Singaporean culture.
 
Food is an integral and important part of Singaporean culture, and plays a central role in the daily lives, traditions, and identity of Singaporeans. From street food stalls to fine dining restaurants, food is an integral part of the social, cultural, and economic fabric of Singapore, and reflects the diverse and multicultural nature of the country.
 
One of the key ways in which food is important within Singaporean culture is the way it reflects the country’s diverse and multicultural heritage. Singapore is a melting pot of different cultures and cuisines, and this diversity is reflected in the country’s food. From traditional Chinese dishes to Indian curries, Malay satay to Indonesian nasi goreng, Singaporean food is a reflection of the country’s diverse and vibrant cultural mix. Moreover, food is also an important way in which different cultural groups in Singapore maintain their traditions and identity, and is an important part of the country’s cultural landscape.
 
Another way in which food is important within Singaporean culture is the way it serves as a social and cultural hub. Food is an important way in which Singaporeans come together and connect with one another, and is a central part of social and cultural life in the country. From family dinners to business meetings, food is an integral part of the social and cultural fabric of Singapore, and serves as a means of building and strengthening relationships. Moreover, food is also an important way in which Singaporeans celebrate and mark special occasions and festivals, and is an integral part of the country’s cultural traditions and rituals.
 
Finally, food is also an important part of the economy of Singapore, and is a significant contributor to the country’s growth and development. The food industry in Singapore is a major contributor to the country’s GDP, and employs a significant number of people. Moreover, food is an important part of the country’s tourism industry, and is a major draw for visitors from around the world.
 
In conclusion, food is an integral and important part of Singaporean culture, and plays a central role in the daily lives, traditions, and identity of Singaporeans. From its reflection of the country’s diverse and multicultural heritage, to its role as a social and cultural hub, to its contribution to the economy, food is an integral and vital part of the cultural landscape of Singapore.
 
 
12) Can fiction teach us anything meaningful about the real world?
 
Fiction is a form of storytelling that involves the creation of imaginary characters, events, and settings, and is often seen as separate and distinct from the real world. However, despite its apparent lack of connection to reality, fiction has the power to teach us meaningful and valuable lessons about the real world, and to provide us with insights, perspectives, and understandings that we may not be able to gain from other sources.
 
One of the ways in which fiction can teach us meaningful lessons about the real world is through the creation of relatable and compelling characters. Fiction allows us to enter the minds and experiences of characters who may be very different from ourselves, and to gain insight into their thoughts, feelings, and motivations. By putting ourselves in the shoes of these characters, we can better understand and empathize with people who are different from us, and can learn valuable lessons about the complexities of human nature.
 
Another way in which fiction can teach us meaningful lessons about the real world is through the creation of imaginative and thought-provoking scenarios and situations. Fiction allows us to explore and consider ideas, concepts, and problems that may be difficult or impossible to explore in the real world, and to gain new and innovative perspectives on these issues. By suspending our disbelief and engaging with the imaginary worlds and scenarios of fiction, we can challenge our assumptions and biases, and can learn to think more critically and creatively about the world around us.
 
Finally, fiction can also teach us meaningful lessons about the real world by providing us with a sense of connection and belonging. Many people turn to fiction as a way of escaping from the stresses and challenges of the real world, and of finding comfort and solace in the stories and characters of books, movies, and television shows. By immersing ourselves in these stories, we can find a sense of meaning and purpose, and can feel connected to others who share our interests and passions.
 
In conclusion, fiction can teach us meaningful and valuable lessons about the real world, and can provide us with insights, perspectives, and understandings that we may not be able to gain from other sources. By engaging with the stories and characters of fiction, we can learn to understand and empathize with others, to think critically and creatively about the world around us, and to find a sense of connection and belonging.
 
 

GP A Level 2018 Questions

 
1) How far is failure an essential part of success?
 
The idea that failure is an essential part of success is a common one, and it is often cited as a way to encourage people to take risks and not be afraid of making mistakes. However, the extent to which failure is actually an essential part of success is a complex and multifaceted issue, and it is important to consider both the potential benefits and drawbacks of this perspective. In this essay, I will explore both sides of this argument and provide examples to illustrate the complexities of this issue.
 
One argument for the view that failure is an essential part of success is that it can provide valuable lessons and experiences that can help us to improve and grow. For example, when we fail at something, it can provide an opportunity to reflect on what went wrong and to learn from our mistakes. This can help us to identify areas where we need to improve and to develop new strategies and approaches. Additionally, failure can also help us to build resilience and determination, as it requires us to persevere and try again in the face of challenges.
 
Another argument is that failure can be a necessary stepping stone on the path to success. For example, many successful people have experienced failures along the way, but they have used those failures as motivation to keep going and eventually achieve their goals. This can be seen in the stories of successful entrepreneurs, who often have to overcome numerous setbacks and failures before achieving success. In this way, failure can be seen as an integral part of the journey to success.
 
However, there are also arguments against the view that failure is an essential part of success. One such argument is that it can be demoralizing and discourage people from pursuing their goals. For example, if someone experiences repeated failures, they may become discouraged and lose confidence in their ability to succeed. Additionally, if failure is seen as an inevitable part of the process, it may discourage people from taking risks and trying new things, as they may be afraid of failing.
 
Another argument is that the focus on failure as an essential part of success can be harmful, as it can lead to a culture of blame and fault-finding. For example, if someone is blamed for a failure, it can be damaging to their self-esteem and can create a negative work environment. Additionally, if failure is seen as an inevitable part of the process, it may discourage people from taking responsibility for their actions and learning from their mistakes.
 
In conclusion, while failure can certainly provide valuable lessons and experiences, the extent to which it is an essential part of success is a complex issue. It is important to recognize that failure can be demoralizing and harmful if it is not properly managed, and that there are other factors that contribute to success, such as perseverance, hard work, and resilience.
 
 
2) To what extent is the pursuit of continuous economic growth a desirable goal?
The pursuit of continuous economic growth is a controversial issue, with different arguments for and against it. On one hand, economic growth can bring about a variety of benefits, such as increased prosperity, job creation, and improved standards of living. On the other hand, there are also concerns about the environmental and social impacts of economic growth, and about the sustainability of continued expansion. In this essay, I will explore both sides of this argument and provide examples to illustrate the complexities of this issue.
 
One argument for the pursuit of continuous economic growth is that it can bring about increased prosperity and improve living standards. For example, as economies grow, there is typically an increase in the availability of goods and services, which can improve the quality of life for people. Additionally, economic growth can also create new job opportunities, which can help to reduce poverty and improve social mobility.
 
Another argument is that economic growth is necessary for addressing social and economic challenges. For example, if an economy is facing high unemployment or low levels of productivity, it may be necessary to stimulate growth in order to address these issues. Additionally, economic growth can also be a way to fund important public goods and services, such as education and healthcare.
 
However, there are also arguments against the pursuit of continuous economic growth. One such argument is that it can have negative environmental impacts, as economic expansion often requires the use of natural resources and the generation of pollution. For example, if an economy is heavily reliant on fossil fuels, economic growth may lead to increased carbon emissions and contribute to climate change. Additionally, economic growth may also lead to the destruction of natural habitats and biodiversity, as more land is needed for development.
 
Another argument is that the pursuit of continuous economic growth may not be sustainable in the long term. For example, if an economy is growing too quickly, it may become overburdened and unable to sustain the expansion. Additionally, as resource constraints become more pressing, it may become increasingly difficult to continue to grow the economy at the same rate.
 
In conclusion, the pursuit of continuous economic growth is a complex issue, and there are arguments for and against it. While economic growth can bring about a variety of benefits, it is important to consider the potential negative impacts and to ensure that it is pursued in a sustainable and responsible way.
 
 
3) In an age of rapid technological advancement, is a single career for life realistic?
The question of whether a single career for life is realistic in an age of rapid technological advancement is a complex one, and it is important to consider both the potential benefits and drawbacks of this approach. On one hand, a single career for life may provide stability and a sense of purpose, and it may allow individuals to become experts in their field. On the other hand, it may also limit opportunities for growth and development, and it may not be feasible in an increasingly dynamic and rapidly changing job market. In this essay, I will explore both sides of this argument and provide examples to illustrate the complexities of this issue.
 
One argument for the idea that a single career for life is realistic is that it can provide stability and a sense of purpose. For example, if someone is able to find a career that they are passionate about and that aligns with their values and goals, it may be fulfilling to pursue that career for an extended period of time. Additionally, a single career for life may allow individuals to become experts in their field and to develop valuable skills and knowledge that are difficult to replicate.
 
Another argument is that a single career for life may be more feasible in certain fields or industries. For example, there are some occupations that have a high level of job security, such as tenured professors or government employees, in which it may be realistic to pursue a single career for life. Additionally, some industries, such as the trades, may have a high demand for workers with specialized skills, which can make it more feasible to pursue a single career for an extended period of time.
 
However, there are also arguments against the idea that a single career for life is realistic in an age of rapid technological advancement. One such argument is that it may limit opportunities for growth and development, as it may prevent individuals from exploring new areas of interest or taking on new challenges. Additionally, in an increasingly dynamic and rapidly changing job market, it may not be feasible to pursue a single career for life, as technological advances and changing economic conditions may lead to job loss or the need to adapt to new skills.
 
Another argument is that the concept of a single career for life may be outdated, as it may not reflect the realities of the modern job market. For example, many people today may have multiple careers or job roles over the course of their lifetime, and they may need to be flexible and adaptable in order to succeed. In this way, the idea of a single career for life may not be realistic or desirable in an age of rapid technological advancement.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether a single career for life is realistic in an age of rapid technological advancement is a complex one, and it depends on a variety of factors. While a single career for life may provide stability and a sense of purpose, it is important to consider the potential drawbacks and to be aware of the changing nature of the job market. It may be more realistic and desirable to be flexible and adaptable in order to succeed in the modern job market.
 
 
4) In the global age we inhabit, there is no justification for national boundaries. How far do you agree?
 
The idea that there is no justification for national boundaries in the global age we inhabit is a controversial one, and it is important to consider both the potential benefits and drawbacks of this perspective. On one hand, national boundaries can be seen as limiting and divisive, and they may create barriers to trade, communication, and cultural exchange. On the other hand, national boundaries also serve important functions, such as protecting the sovereignty of states and providing a sense of identity and belonging for their citizens. In this essay, I will explore both sides of this argument and provide examples to illustrate the complexities of this issue.
 
One argument for the view that there is no justification for national boundaries is that they can create barriers to trade, communication, and cultural exchange. For example, national boundaries can create barriers to the free flow of goods and services, which can be inefficient and hinder economic growth. Additionally, national boundaries can also create barriers to the free exchange of ideas and knowledge, which can be detrimental to progress and innovation.
 
Another argument is that national boundaries can be seen as limiting and divisive, and that they can contribute to conflicts and misunderstandings between nations. For example, national boundaries can create a sense of us versus them, which can lead to competition and conflict. Additionally, national boundaries can also create a sense of exclusion and otherness, which can lead to misunderstandings and prejudices between people from different nations.
 
However, there are also arguments against the view that there is no justification for national boundaries. One such argument is that national boundaries serve important functions, such as protecting the sovereignty of states and maintaining their independence. For example, national boundaries can help to ensure that states have control over their own affairs and are not subject to interference or domination by other states. Additionally, national boundaries can also provide a sense of identity and belonging for citizens, and they can help to maintain cultural and linguistic traditions.
 
Another argument is that the abolition of national boundaries may not be practical or desirable, as it would require a significant shift in political, economic, and social systems. For example, if national boundaries were to be abolished, it would be necessary to fundamentally rethink issues such as governance, taxation, and representation. Additionally, it is not clear that the abolition of national boundaries would be welcomed by all people, as it may be seen as a threat to cultural and national identities. In this way, the abolition of national boundaries may not be practical or desirable, as it would require a significant shift in political, economic, and social systems, and it may not be welcomed by all people.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether there is justification for national boundaries in the global age we inhabit is a complex one, and there are arguments for and against it. While national boundaries can create barriers to trade, communication, and cultural exchange, they also serve important functions, such as protecting the sovereignty of states and providing a sense of identity and belonging for their citizens. It is important to consider both the potential benefits and drawbacks of national boundaries, and to be aware of the complexities of this issue.
 
 
5) To what extent is sporting achievement given adequate recognition in your society?
 
The question of to what extent sporting achievement is given adequate recognition in a particular society is a complex and multifaceted one, and it depends on a variety of factors. On one hand, sporting achievements can be seen as a source of pride and inspiration, and they may be celebrated and recognized in various ways, such as through media coverage, awards, and public events. On the other hand, there may also be concerns about the extent to which sporting achievements are valued and recognized in comparison to other forms of achievement, and about the ways in which they are used to promote certain values and agendas. In this essay, I will explore both sides of this argument and provide examples to illustrate the complexities of this issue.
 
One argument for the view that sporting achievement is given adequate recognition in a particular society is that it can be a source of pride and inspiration, and that it is celebrated and recognized in various ways. For example, successful sports teams and athletes may receive media coverage, awards, and public recognition for their achievements. Additionally, sporting events may be used to promote national pride and unity, and they may be seen as an important part of the cultural fabric of a society.
 
Another argument is that sporting achievement can be an important way to promote physical activity and healthy lifestyles. For example, by celebrating and recognizing sporting achievements, a society may be able to encourage people to be more physically active and to adopt healthy habits. This can have a range of benefits, such as improving public health and reducing the burden of disease.
 
However, there are also arguments against the view that sporting achievement is given adequate recognition in a particular society. One such argument is that it may be valued and recognized more highly than other forms of achievement, such as academic or artistic achievement. For example, there may be more media coverage and public recognition for successful sports teams and athletes than for other types of achievement, which can create an unbalanced emphasis on sporting success.
 
Another argument is that sporting achievement may be used to promote certain values and agendas that are not necessarily universal or beneficial. For example, sporting events may be used to promote nationalism and militarism, and to reinforce certain cultural and social norms. Additionally, the pursuit of sporting success may be seen as more important than other types of achievement, which can create a narrow focus on this area and discourage other forms of achievement.
 
In conclusion, the extent to which sporting achievement is given adequate recognition in a particular society is a complex and multifaceted issue, and it depends on a variety of factors. While sporting achievements can be a source of pride and inspiration and can be celebrated and recognized in various ways, there are also concerns about the extent to which they are valued and recognized in comparison to other forms of achievement, and about the ways in which they are used to promote certain values and agendas. It is important to consider these complexities and to ensure that sporting achievement is recognized in a balanced and responsible way.
 
 
6) Do handicrafts still have value when machine-produced goods are so readily available?
 
The question of whether handicrafts still have value when machine-produced goods are so readily available is a complex and controversial one, and it depends on a variety of factors. On one hand, machine-produced goods may be seen as more efficient, cost-effective, and readily available, which can make them more appealing than handicrafts. On the other hand, handicrafts can also be valued for their uniqueness, craftsmanship, and cultural significance, which may make them more desirable than machine-produced goods. In this essay, I will explore both sides of this argument and provide examples to illustrate the complexities of this issue.
 
One argument for the view that handicrafts still have value when machine-produced goods are so readily available is that they can offer uniqueness and craftsmanship that is not possible with machine-produced goods. For example, handmade items may have a level of detail and quality that cannot be replicated by machines, and they may be seen as more special and valuable because of this. Additionally, handicrafts can also be valued for their cultural significance, as they may be tied to traditional techniques and designs that are unique to a particular place or community.
 
Another argument is that the demand for handicrafts can help to support local economies and preserve traditional skills and techniques. For example, if people are willing to pay for handmade items, it can provide a source of income for craftspeople and help to preserve traditional skills and techniques that may otherwise be lost. Additionally, supporting the handicrafts industry can help to promote cultural diversity and preserve traditional ways of life.
 
However, there are also arguments against the view that handicrafts still have value when machine-produced goods are so readily available. One such argument is that machine-produced goods may be more efficient, cost-effective, and readily available, which can make them more appealing than handicrafts. For example, machine-produced goods may be produced more quickly and at a lower cost, which can make them more accessible to a wider range of people. Additionally, machine-produced goods may be more consistent and reliable, which can make them more appealing to consumers.
 
Another argument is that the demand for handicrafts may not be sufficient to support a viable industry, and that it may be more practical and efficient to rely on machine-produced goods. For example, if the demand for handmade items is low, it may not be feasible for craftspeople to make a living producing them, and it may be more practical to turn to machine-produced goods instead. Additionally, if the demand for handicrafts is low, it may not be possible to preserve traditional skills and techniques, as there may not be enough support for them.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether handicrafts still have value when machine-produced goods are so readily available is a complex and multifaceted one, and it depends on a variety of factors. While handicrafts can offer uniqueness, craftsmanship, and cultural significance, they may also be limited by factors such as efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and availability. It is important to consider these complexities and to find a balance between the value of handicrafts and the practicalities of machine-produced goods.
 
 
7) People today do not work as hard as they did in the past. How true is this of your society?
 
The question of whether people today work as hard as they did in the past is a complex and controversial one, and it depends on a variety of factors. On one hand, it may be argued that people today have more leisure time and work fewer hours than they did in the past, and that they are less likely to work in physically demanding or dangerous jobs. On the other hand, it may also be argued that people today face new challenges and pressures that make their work just as demanding as it was in the past, if not more so. In this essay, I will explore both sides of this argument and provide examples to illustrate the complexities of this issue.
 
One argument for the view that people today do not work as hard as they did in the past is that they have more leisure time and work fewer hours. For example, in many countries, the average work week has been shortened and there are more protections for workers, such as overtime pay and vacation time. Additionally, advances in technology and automation have made many jobs easier and less physically demanding, which can reduce the amount of effort required to perform them.
 
Another argument is that people today are less likely to work in physically demanding or dangerous jobs, which can make their work less strenuous overall. For example, in many countries, there are regulations and safety standards that protect workers from hazardous conditions, and there are also fewer jobs that require manual labor or physically demanding work.
 
However, there are also arguments against the view that people today do not work as hard as they did in the past. One such argument is that people today face new challenges and pressures that make their work just as demanding as it was in the past, if not more so. For example, the increasing pace of change and the global nature of business can make it more difficult for people to keep up with new developments and technologies. Additionally, the increasing expectations for productivity and the demands of a 24/7 work culture can make it difficult for people to disconnect from work and to maintain a healthy work-life balance.
 
Another argument is that the concept of work has changed, and that people today may work in different ways than they did in the past. For example, people today may work in more flexible or freelance roles, or they may have multiple jobs or responsibilities. This can make it difficult to compare the amount of work that people do today with that of the past, as the nature of work itself has changed.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether people today work as hard as they did in the past is a complex and multifaceted one, and it depends on a variety of factors. While people today may have more leisure time and work fewer hours, and may be less likely to work in physically demanding or dangerous jobs, they may also face new challenges and pressures that make their work just as demanding as it was in the past. It is important to consider these complexities and to recognize that the nature of work has changed over time, and that it is not always possible to make direct comparisons between the present and the past.
 
 
8) Discuss the view that all countries have an equal responsibility to counter terrorism.
 
The view that all countries have an equal responsibility to counter terrorism is a controversial one, and it raises a number of complex and important issues. On one hand, it may be argued that terrorism is a global problem that affects all countries, and that all countries therefore have a shared responsibility to address it. On the other hand, it may also be argued that different countries have different capabilities, resources, and interests, and that their responsibilities to counter terrorism may vary accordingly. In this essay, I will explore both sides of this argument and provide examples to illustrate the complexities of this issue.
 
One argument for the view that all countries have an equal responsibility to counter terrorism is that terrorism is a global problem that affects all countries, and that all countries therefore have a shared responsibility to address it. For example, terrorism can have a range of negative impacts, such as loss of life, economic disruption, and social instability, which can affect all countries. Additionally, terrorism can also pose a threat to international peace and security, and to the values and principles that underpin the global system, which can make it a concern for all countries.
 
Another argument is that all countries have a responsibility to respect and uphold international law, including laws related to terrorism. For example, many countries have signed international conventions and agreements that obligate them to take action against terrorism, and they are expected to fulfill these obligations. Additionally, all countries have a responsibility to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of other countries, and to refrain from supporting or promoting terrorism within their borders.
 
However, there are also arguments against the view that all countries have an equal responsibility to counter terrorism. One such argument is that different countries have different capabilities, resources, and interests, and that their responsibilities to counter terrorism may vary accordingly. For example, some countries may have more advanced intelligence and security systems, or may have more experience in combating terrorism, and they may be able to contribute more effectively to counter-terrorism efforts. Additionally, some countries may be more vulnerable to terrorism, or may have a greater stake in combating it, and they may therefore have a greater responsibility to do so.
 
Another argument is that the global nature of terrorism can make it difficult for individual countries to address it effectively, and that international cooperation and coordination are necessary to address it effectively. For example, terrorism often involves cross-border networks and activities, and it may be necessary for countries to share information, intelligence, and resources in order to effectively combat it. Additionally, it may be necessary for countries to work together to address the underlying factors that contribute to terrorism, such as poverty, conflict, and political instability.
 
In conclusion, the view that all countries have an equal responsibility to counter terrorism is a complex and multifaceted one, and it raises a number of important issues. While all countries may be affected by terrorism and may have a shared responsibility to address it, their capabilities, resources, and interests may vary, and it may be necessary to take these differences into account when determining their responsibilities. Additionally, the global nature of terrorism can make it difficult for individual countries to address it effectively, and international cooperation and coordination may be necessary to address it effectively. It is important to consider these complexities and to find a balanced and effective approach to combating terrorism.
 
 
9) Is pressure a motivating force or a cause for unhappiness?
 
The question of whether pressure is a motivating force or a cause for unhappiness is a complex and multifaceted one, and it depends on a variety of factors. On one hand, pressure can be seen as a motivating force, as it can push people to perform at their best and to achieve their goals. On the other hand, pressure can also be seen as a cause for unhappiness, as it can create stress and anxiety, and can lead to negative outcomes such as burnout and mental health problems. In this essay, I will explore both sides of this argument and provide examples to illustrate the complexities of this issue.
 
One argument for the view that pressure is a motivating force is that it can push people to perform at their best and to achieve their goals. For example, pressure to succeed in school or at work may encourage people to work harder and to pursue their goals more determinedly. Additionally, pressure to meet certain standards or expectations may lead people to challenge themselves and to strive for excellence.
 
Another argument is that pressure can be a natural and inevitable part of life, and that it is up to individuals to learn how to handle it in a healthy and constructive way. For example, people may learn to use pressure as a motivator, rather than as a source of stress and anxiety, and they may find ways to manage it effectively. This can help them to achieve their goals and to lead more fulfilling and successful lives.
 
However, there are also arguments against the view that pressure is a motivating force. One such argument is that pressure can be a cause for unhappiness, as it can create stress and anxiety, and can lead to negative outcomes such as burnout and mental health problems. For example, excessive pressure to succeed or to meet certain standards may lead people to feel overwhelmed and stressed, and may prevent them from enjoying their work or other activities. Additionally, pressure may lead people to engage in unhealthy or destructive behaviors, such as overworking or neglecting their physical or mental health.
 
Another argument is that pressure may not be an effective motivator for everyone, and that it may be more effective to use other methods to encourage people to achieve their goals. For example, some people may be more motivated by positive reinforcement or by the opportunity to learn and grow, rather than by pressure. Additionally, some people may be more sensitive to pressure, and may be more likely to feel overwhelmed or stressed by it.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether pressure is a motivating force or a cause for unhappiness is a complex and multifaceted one, and it depends on a variety of factors. While pressure can be a motivator for some people, it can also be a cause for unhappiness for others, and it is important to consider these complexities and to find a balance between the use of pressure and the need for well-being and happiness. It may also be necessary to recognize that different people may respond to pressure in different ways, and to find strategies that work best for each individual.
 
 
10) Works of art which have been removed from their country of origin should be returned. Discuss.
 
The question of whether works of art that have been removed from their country of origin should be returned is a complex and controversial one, and it raises a number of important issues. On one hand, it may be argued that works of art have cultural and historical value, and that they should be returned to their country of origin in order to preserve this value and to respect the cultural heritage of the country. On the other hand, it may also be argued that works of art have universal value, and that they should be shared and enjoyed by all, regardless of their country of origin. In this essay, I will explore both sides of this argument and provide examples to illustrate the complexities of this issue.
 
One argument for the view that works of art that have been removed from their country of origin should be returned is that they have cultural and historical value, and that they should be returned in order to preserve this value and to respect the cultural heritage of the country. For example, many works of art are closely tied to the culture and history of the country in which they were created, and they may be seen as an important part of the country’s cultural identity. Additionally, works of art may also be seen as an important source of information about the culture and history of the country, and their return may be seen as a way to preserve and protect this information.
 
One example of a work of art that has been returned to its country of origin is the Elgin Marbles, a collection of ancient Greek sculptures that were removed from the Parthenon in Athens by the British diplomat Lord Elgin in the early 19th century. The Elgin Marbles have been a source of controversy for many years, as Greece has called for their return, arguing that they are an important part of the country’s cultural heritage and that their removal was a violation of international law. However, the British Museum, where the Elgin Marbles are currently housed, has argued that they are a universal cultural treasure and that they should be shared and enjoyed by all.
 
Another argument for the return of works of art is that they may be at risk of damage, loss, or neglect when they are removed from their country of origin, and that their return may be necessary to ensure their preservation. For example, works of art may be exposed to different climatic conditions, pests, or other hazards when they are removed from their country of origin, and their return may be necessary to protect them from these risks. Additionally, works of art may be less likely to be properly cared for or preserved when they are removed from their country of origin, and their return may be necessary to ensure that they are treated with the appropriate respect and care.
 
An example of a work of art that was returned to its country of origin due to concerns about its preservation is the Benin Bronzes, a collection of bronze sculptures that were created in what is now modern-day Nigeria in the 16th and 17th centuries. The Benin Bronzes were removed from the Kingdom of Benin by British troops during a military expedition in 1897, and they have been housed in museums around the world ever since. In recent years, there have been calls for the return of the Benin Bronzes to Nigeria, as it is believed that they would be better cared for and preserved in their country of origin.
 
However, there are also arguments against the view that works of art that have been removed from their country of origin should be returned. One such argument is that works of art have universal value, and that they should be shared and enjoyed by all, regardless of their country of origin. For example, works of art may be seen as a source of inspiration, beauty, or cultural enrichment for people of all cultures, and their return may be seen as a way to limit access to them. Additionally, works of art may be seen as a way to promote understanding and appreciation of different cultures, and their return may be seen as a way to limit this understanding and appreciation.
 
One example of a work of art that has been retained in its current location due to its universal value is the Rosetta Stone, an ancient Egyptian artifact that was discovered in 1799. The Rosetta Stone, which is inscribed with a decree in three different scripts, has been housed in the British Museum since 1802, and it is considered to be a universal cultural treasure. Despite calls for its return to Egypt, the British Museum has argued that it should be kept in its current location in order to be shared and enjoyed by all.
 
Another argument against the return of works of art is that the return of such works may be difficult or impractical, and that it may be more effective to find other ways to preserve their cultural and historical value. For example, the return of works of art may be complicated by legal, financial, or logistical issues, and it may be more practical to find other ways to ensure their preservation. Additionally, the return of works of art may be seen as an attempt to rewrite history or to erase the cultural influences of other countries, and it may be more constructive to find other ways to acknowledge and respect these influences.
 
An example of a work of art that has not been returned due to practical considerations is the Moai Statues, a collection of monolithic stone statues on Easter Island that were carved by the Rapa Nui people in the 9th to 16th centuries. Despite calls for their return to Easter Island, it is believed that the Moai Statues would be at risk of damage if they were moved, and that it is more practical to leave them in their current locations.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether works of art that have been removed from their country of origin should be returned is a complex and multifaceted one, and it raises a number of important issues. While works of art may have cultural and historical value, and their return may be necessary to preserve this value and to respect the cultural heritage of the country, they may also have universal value, and their return may be seen as a way to limit access to them. It is important to consider these complexities and to find a balanced and effective approach to the return of works of art, taking into account their cultural and historical value, as well as their universal value and the practicalities of their return. In some cases, it may be necessary to find alternative ways to preserve the cultural and historical value of works of art, such as through education, collaboration, or other means. Ultimately, the decision of whether to return works of art to their country of origin should be based on a careful consideration of these issues, and should be guided by a desire to respect and preserve the cultural and historical value of these works of art, while also recognizing their universal value and the need to find practical and effective solutions.
 
 
11) Foreign aid does not solve long-term problems.’ To what extent is this a fair viewpoint?
The question of whether foreign aid solves long-term problems is a complex and controversial one, and it depends on a variety of factors. On one hand, it may be argued that foreign aid does not solve long-term problems, as it may not address the root causes of poverty or other challenges, and it may not be sustainable in the long term. On the other hand, it may also be argued that foreign aid can play an important role in addressing long-term problems, and that it can be an effective way to address urgent needs and to promote long-term development. In this essay, I will explore both sides of this argument and provide examples to illustrate the complexities of this issue.
 
One argument for the view that foreign aid does not solve long-term problems is that it may not address the root causes of poverty or other challenges, and it may not be sustainable in the long term. For example, foreign aid may be focused on providing immediate relief rather than addressing the underlying causes of poverty, such as lack of education, access to healthcare, or economic opportunities. Additionally, foreign aid may be dependent on the continued support of donors, and it may not be able to provide a long-term solution to the challenges that it is intended to address.
 
An example of a situation where foreign aid has been criticized for not addressing long-term problems is the food aid program in Ethiopia. In the 1980s and 1990s, Ethiopia received significant amounts of food aid to address a severe famine, but this aid was not accompanied by efforts to address the root causes of the famine, such as poor land management, lack of infrastructure, and political instability. As a result, the food aid did not lead to long-term improvements in food security in Ethiopia, and the country continued to experience periodic food crises in the years following the initial aid effort.
 
Another argument for the view that foreign aid does not solve long-term problems is that it may create dependency, discourage local development, and undermine local initiatives. For example, foreign aid may discourage people from seeking work or from starting their own businesses, as they may rely on aid for their basic needs. Additionally, foreign aid may discourage local governments from investing in their own development, as they may rely on aid to meet the needs of their citizens.
 
An example where foreign aid has been criticized for creating dependency and undermining local initiatives is the aid program in Haiti. Haiti has received significant amounts of foreign aid following a series of natural disasters and political crises, but this aid has been criticized for not promoting long-term development, and for creating dependency on aid rather than encouraging local initiatives. As a result, Haiti has remained one of the poorest countries in the world, despite decades of foreign aid efforts.
 
However, there are also arguments against the view that foreign aid does not solve long-term problems. One such argument is that foreign aid can play an important role in addressing long-term problems, and that it can be an effective way to address urgent needs and to promote long-term development. For example, foreign aid may be necessary to provide immediate relief in the face of emergencies, such as natural disasters, famines, or armed conflicts, and it may be able to save lives and prevent further suffering. Additionally, foreign aid may be able to provide the resources and support needed to address long-term challenges, such as poverty, lack of access to education and healthcare, or environmental degradation.
 
Bangladesh has received significant amounts of foreign aid to address poverty and other challenges, and this aid has been accompanied by efforts to promote long-term development, such as investing in education, healthcare, and economic opportunities. As a result, Bangladesh has made significant progress in reducing poverty and improving the lives of its citizens, and it has become a model for the role that foreign aid can play in promoting long-term development.
 
Another argument against the view that foreign aid does not solve long-term problems is that it may be necessary to provide a safety net for people who are unable to meet their basic needs, and that it may be an important way to promote human rights and dignity. For example, foreign aid may be necessary to provide food, shelter, and other necessities to people who are suffering from poverty, conflict, or other challenges, and it may be an important way to ensure that they are able to live with dignity and respect. Additionally, foreign aid may be an important way to promote human rights and to support efforts to address social and economic injustice.
 
The aid program in Malawi has demonstrated how foreign aid has been successful in promoting human rights and dignity. Malawi has received significant amounts of foreign aid to address poverty and other challenges, and this aid has been accompanied by efforts to promote human rights and to address social and economic injustice. As a result, Malawi has made progress in reducing poverty and improving the lives of its citizens, and it has become a leader in the effort to promote human rights and social justice in Africa.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether foreign aid solves long-term problems is a complex and multifaceted one, and it depends on a variety of factors. While foreign aid may not always be successful in addressing the root causes of poverty or other challenges, and it may not be sustainable in the long term, it can also play an important role in addressing urgent needs and promoting long-term development. It is important to consider these complexities and to find a balanced and effective approach to foreign aid, taking into account the urgent needs of communities, as well as the long-term challenges that they face. This may involve supporting efforts to address the root causes of poverty and other challenges, such as investing in education, healthcare, and economic opportunities, as well as providing immediate relief in the face of emergencies. Additionally, it may be important to ensure that foreign aid is delivered in a way that promotes human rights and dignity, and that it supports local initiatives and promotes long-term sustainability. Ultimately, the effectiveness of foreign aid in solving long-term problems will depend on a careful consideration of these issues, and on the development of strategies that are tailored to the specific needs and challenges of each community.
 
 
12) Consider the view that we do not take enough responsibility for our own well-being.
 
There is a common belief that we should be responsible for our own well-being, both physical and mental. However, there are those who argue that we do not take enough responsibility for our own well-being, relying instead on external factors such as the healthcare system or the government to take care of us. This essay will consider the view that we do not take enough responsibility for our own well-being, examining the various ways in which this might be the case and considering the potential consequences of this lack of responsibility.
 
One way in which we might be said to not take enough responsibility for our own well-being is through our lack of attention to our physical health. Many people do not engage in regular physical activity, eat unhealthy diets, and make poor lifestyle choices that can have negative impacts on their health. While there are certainly external factors that can contribute to these decisions, such as a lack of access to healthy food or safe places to exercise, ultimately it is up to the individual to make the choice to prioritize their health.
 
Another way in which we might not take enough responsibility for our own well-being is through our lack of attention to our mental health. Mental health is just as important as physical health, yet many people do not prioritize it in the same way. They may neglect to seek treatment for mental health conditions, or may not take steps to prevent the development of such conditions in the first place. This can have serious consequences, as untreated mental health issues can lead to a range of problems including difficulty functioning in daily life, relationship issues, and even physical health problems.
 
A third way in which we might not take enough responsibility for our own well-being is through our reliance on external sources of support, rather than seeking to create a sense of well-being from within ourselves. Many people look to external sources such as wealth, success, or the approval of others in order to feel good about themselves, rather than finding self-acceptance and contentment from within. This can lead to a lack of fulfillment and a constant striving for more, rather than finding true happiness and well-being.
 
In conclusion, the view that we do not take enough responsibility for our own well-being is a valid one, as there are many ways in which we neglect to prioritize our own health and well-being. By taking greater responsibility for our own well-being, we can improve our physical and mental health, as well as create a sense of fulfillment and contentment from within ourselves.
 
 

GP A Level 2017 Questions

 
1) The past is not dead. It is not even past. Discuss.
 
The past is not dead. It is not even past. This statement, attributed to the American writer William Faulkner, suggests that the events and experiences of the past continue to have a powerful influence on the present and the future. Many people believe that the past is simply a collection of historical events and stories that have no relevance to the present, but this view is short-sighted and fails to recognize the complex and interconnected nature of human history.
 
One of the main reasons that the past is not dead is that it shapes our present and future in countless ways. The choices and actions of people in the past have had a profound impact on the world we live in today, and will continue to shape the world of tomorrow. For example, the Industrial Revolution of the 18th and 19th centuries, which was driven by technological innovations and advances in transportation and communication, fundamentally transformed the way that people lived and worked, and laid the foundation for the modern global economy. Similarly, major historical events such as wars, revolutions, and social movements have had a lasting impact on society and politics, and continue to be remembered and studied today.
 
Another reason that the past is not dead is that it is deeply embedded in our personal and cultural identities. Our experiences and memories, as well as the stories and traditions passed down to us from previous generations, shape who we are and how we see the world. Our cultural and personal histories provide us with a sense of belonging and connection to others, and help us to understand and make sense of the world around us.
 
It is important to recognize that the past is not simply a collection of static events, but is an ongoing and evolving process. The way that we remember and interpret the past is influenced by the present, and the events of the past are constantly being reinterpreted and reevaluated in light of new evidence and perspectives. This means that the past is not a fixed entity, but is constantly being reshaped and reimagined by the people of the present.
 
In conclusion, the past is not dead. It is not even past. The events and experiences of the past continue to shape and influence the present and the future in countless ways, and are deeply embedded in our personal and cultural identities. It is important that we recognize and understand the complexities and interconnectedness of history, and strive to learn from the past in order to create a better future.
 
 
2) Can the use of animals for scientific research ever be justified?
 
The use of animals for scientific research has long been a controversial topic, with many people arguing that it is unethical to use animals in this way. While it is certainly true that animals should be treated with respect and compassion, and that their welfare should be protected, there are also strong arguments in favor of using animals in scientific research. In this essay, I will argue that, under certain conditions, the use of animals for scientific research can be justified.
 
One of the main arguments in favor of using animals in scientific research is that it has the potential to lead to significant scientific and medical advances. For example, animal research has played a critical role in the development of many life-saving drugs and medical treatments, such as insulin for diabetes and antibiotics for infections. Without the use of animals in research, it is likely that many of these important discoveries would not have been made.
 
Another argument in favor of animal research is that it can help to improve our understanding of basic biological processes and improve our ability to predict and prevent human disease. For example, animal research has provided valuable insights into the causes and potential treatments for a wide range of diseases, including cancer, heart disease, and mental illness. By studying the effects of these diseases on animals, researchers can gain a better understanding of how they occur and how they can be prevented or treated in humans.
 
It is also important to note that the use of animals in scientific research is heavily regulated and is subject to strict ethical guidelines. In many countries, the use of animals in research is only permitted if it is deemed to be scientifically necessary and if the potential benefits outweigh the potential harms to the animals involved. Researchers are also required to minimize any suffering experienced by the animals and to provide appropriate care and housing for them.
 
Despite these arguments in favor of animal research, it is also important to recognize that the use of animals in scientific research is not always justified. In cases where there are viable alternatives to animal research, such as cell culture or computer modeling, these should be used instead. Additionally, it is important to ensure that the use of animals in research is strictly regulated and that the welfare of the animals is protected at all times.
 
In conclusion, the use of animals for scientific research can be justified under certain conditions, as it has the potential to lead to significant scientific and medical advances and can help to improve our understanding of basic biological processes and human disease. However, it is important to ensure that animal research is strictly regulated and that the welfare of the animals is protected, and to use alternatives to animal research whenever possible.
 
 
3) In your society, to what extent is it acceptable for public money to be used for the acquisition of works of art?
 
In any society, there is always a debate over how public money should be allocated and what purposes it is acceptable to use it for. When it comes to the acquisition of works of art, opinions may vary widely on the extent to which it is acceptable for public money to be used. In this essay, I will argue that, while there are certainly valid arguments for and against the use of public money for the acquisition of works of art, there are also strong reasons to support such spending.
 
One argument against the use of public money for the acquisition of works of art is that there are many other pressing needs and priorities that should take precedence. For example, some people may argue that public funds should be focused on issues such as education, healthcare, and social services, rather than being used to buy art. While these are certainly important areas that deserve attention and support, it is important to recognize that the arts can also have significant social and economic benefits.
 
One of the main arguments in favor of using public money for the acquisition of works of art is that it can have a positive impact on the local economy. For example, a thriving arts scene can attract tourists and businesses to a region, which can generate additional tax revenue and create jobs. Additionally, the arts can help to revitalize struggling neighborhoods and contribute to community development.
 
Another argument in favor of using public money for the acquisition of works of art is that it can help to promote cultural diversity and understanding. By supporting the arts, communities can expose themselves to different perspectives and experiences, and can foster a greater appreciation of the diversity of human culture. This can help to break down barriers and promote greater understanding and cooperation between different groups.
 
Of course, it is important to recognize that there are also valid concerns about the use of public money for the acquisition of works of art. For example, there may be questions about how such spending is prioritized and how decisions are made about which works of art to acquire. It is essential that any use of public money for the acquisition of works of art is transparent and accountable, and that there are clear criteria in place to guide decision-making.
 
In conclusion, the extent to which it is acceptable for public money to be used for the acquisition of works of art is a complex and multifaceted issue that depends on a variety of factors. While there are valid arguments both for and against such spending, there are also strong reasons to support the use of public money for the acquisition of works of art, as it can have a positive impact on the local economy, promote cultural diversity and understanding, and contribute to community development. It is important to ensure that any use of public money for the acquisition of works of art is transparent and accountable, and that there are clear criteria in place to guide decision-making.
 
 
4) Rehabilitation, not punishment, should be the purpose of the justice system. Discuss.
 
The purpose of the justice system is to hold individuals accountable for their actions and to protect society from harm. For many years, the dominant approach to crime and punishment has been based on the idea of retribution, or the idea that offenders should be punished for their wrongdoing. However, there is growing recognition that this approach has many limitations and that rehabilitation, or the process of helping offenders to become productive and law-abiding members of society, should be the primary focus of the justice system. In this essay, I will argue that rehabilitation, not punishment, should be the purpose of the justice system.
 
One of the main reasons that rehabilitation should be the purpose of the justice system is that it is a more effective approach to reducing crime and promoting public safety. Studies have consistently shown that rehabilitation programs, such as education, job training, and substance abuse treatment, are much more effective at reducing recidivism (the tendency of offenders to reoffend) than punishment alone. For example, a meta-analysis of more than 500 studies found that rehabilitation programs reduced recidivism by an average of 18% compared to traditional punishment. This means that rehabilitation not only benefits the offenders who participate in these programs, but also helps to create a safer society for everyone.
 
Another reason that rehabilitation should be the focus of the justice system is that it is more humane and just. Punishment, especially in the form of long prison sentences, can be harsh and dehumanizing, and can have long-term negative consequences for offenders and their families. Rehabilitation, on the other hand, is focused on helping offenders to overcome the underlying issues that may have contributed to their criminal behavior and to develop the skills and knowledge they need to lead successful and productive lives. This approach recognizes that offenders are human beings with the potential to change and to make positive contributions to society, and treats them with dignity and respect.
 
It is also important to recognize that the current emphasis on punishment is often ineffective and costly. Incarceration, in particular, is expensive and can create a cycle of crime and punishment that is difficult to break. By contrast, rehabilitation programs can be more cost-effective and provide long-term benefits for both offenders and society. For example, education and job training programs can help offenders to find employment and become self-sufficient, which can reduce the burden on social services and generate tax revenue.
 
Despite these arguments in favor of rehabilitation, it is also important to recognize that there may be cases where punishment is necessary, such as in cases of violent or dangerous offenders. However, even in these cases, rehabilitation should still be a key component of the justice system, as it can help to reduce the likelihood of reoffending and promote public safety.
 
In conclusion, rehabilitation, not punishment, should be the purpose of the justice system. Rehabilitation is a more effective approach to reducing crime and promoting public safety, is more humane and just, and can be more cost-effective and provide long-term benefits for both offenders and society. While punishment may be necessary in some cases, it should be seen as a means to an end, rather than an end in itself, and should be accompanied by rehabilitation efforts to help offenders overcome the underlying issues that may have contributed to their criminal behavior.
 
 
5) Is regulation of the press desirable?
 
The question of whether regulation of the press is desirable is a complex and highly debated issue that touches on fundamental questions about freedom of expression, democracy, and the role of the media in society. On the one hand, it can be argued that regulation of the press is necessary to ensure that the media operates in an ethical and responsible manner, and to protect the public from misinformation and harmful content. On the other hand, it can be argued that regulation of the press is undesirable, as it can stifle free expression and limit the ability of the media to hold those in power accountable. In this essay, I will argue that, while there are valid arguments on both sides of this issue, regulation of the press is generally undesirable and that alternative approaches, such as self-regulation and media literacy, are more effective in promoting responsible and ethical media practices.
 
One of the main arguments in favor of regulating the press is that it is necessary to protect the public from harmful or misleading content. For example, some people argue that the press should be regulated to ensure that it does not disseminate false or misleading information that could have serious consequences, such as inciting violence or spreading misinformation about public health issues. Others argue that the press should be regulated to protect individuals from defamation or invasion of privacy, especially when it comes to sensitive or personal matters.
 
However, there are also strong arguments against regulating the press. One of the main arguments is that regulation of the press can stifle free expression and limit the ability of the media to hold those in power accountable. In many countries, the media plays a critical role in exposing corruption, abuse of power, and other wrongdoing, and is often referred to as the “fourth estate” or the “watchdog” of democracy. If the press is heavily regulated, it may be less able to perform this important role and may become more inclined to self-censorship.
 
Another argument against regulating the press is that it can be difficult to define what constitutes harmful or misleading content, and that different people and groups may have different perspectives on this issue. For example, what one person considers to be harmful or misleading may be viewed by others as important or necessary information. This can create a situation where the press is censored or punished for reporting on issues that are controversial or unpopular, but which are nevertheless important for the public to know about.
 
Instead of regulating the press, there are other approaches that can be more effective in promoting responsible and ethical media practices. One such approach is self-regulation, in which the media industry develops and adheres to codes of conduct and ethical standards. This approach allows the media to hold itself accountable and to set its own standards, while also allowing for flexibility and adaptability. Another approach is media literacy, which involves educating the public about how to critically evaluate media content and to be aware of potential biases or sources of misinformation. By empowering individuals to make informed decisions about what they read and watch, media literacy can help to promote a more informed and engaged society.
 
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of the issue, regulation of the press is generally undesirable. Instead of regulating the press, alternative approaches, such as self-regulation and media literacy, are more effective in promoting responsible and ethical media practices. These approaches allow for flexibility and adaptability, and empower individuals to make informed decisions about what they read and watch.
 
 
6) Do events, rather than politicians, shape the future?
 
The question of whether events or politicians shape the future is a complex and highly debated issue that touches on fundamental questions about the role of individuals and institutions in shaping the course of history. On the one hand, it can be argued that politicians, as leaders and decision-makers, have a significant influence on the direction of society and the course of events. On the other hand, it can be argued that events, such as natural disasters, technological innovations, and social movements, can have a powerful impact on the future and can shape the actions and policies of politicians. In this essay, I will argue that both events and politicians play important roles in shaping the future, and that the interplay between these two factors is complex and dynamic.
 
One of the main arguments in favor of the idea that politicians shape the future is that they hold positions of power and influence, and have the ability to make decisions that can have far-reaching consequences. Politicians can shape the direction of society through the laws and policies they enact, the appointments they make, and the messages they communicate to the public. For example, the decisions of political leaders can have a major impact on issues such as the economy, foreign relations, and social issues.
 
However, it is also important to recognize that events can have a powerful impact on the future, and can shape the actions and policies of politicians. For example, natural disasters or economic crises can create urgent problems that require immediate attention and can force politicians to take action. Similarly, technological innovations or social movements can create new opportunities or challenges that require politicians to adapt and respond. In these cases, events can shape the future by forcing politicians to take action or by creating new options and possibilities.
 
The relationship between events and politicians is complex and dynamic, and it is often difficult to predict which will have the greater influence on the future. In some cases, politicians may be able to shape events through their actions, while in other cases events may shape the actions of politicians. For example, a political leader may be able to influence the outcome of a war through their strategic decisions, while a natural disaster may force a government to adopt new policies or allocate resources in a different way.
 
In conclusion, both events and politicians play important roles in shaping the future. While politicians have the ability to make decisions and take actions that can have far-reaching consequences, events can also have a powerful impact on the direction of society and the actions of politicians. The interplay between these two factors is complex and dynamic, and it is often difficult to predict which will have the greater influence on the future. What is clear, however, is that both events and politicians have the potential to shape the course of history in significant ways, and that the future is shaped by a complex and interconnected web of factors.
 
 
7) How far is science fiction becoming fact?
 
Science fiction has long been a popular genre of literature and film, offering a glimpse into possible futures and exploring the potential consequences of scientific and technological advancements. In recent years, there has been a debate about how far science fiction is becoming fact, with some people arguing that many of the ideas and technologies depicted in science fiction are becoming a reality, while others argue that these ideas remain firmly in the realm of fiction. In this essay, I will argue that while science fiction often serves as a source of inspiration and a way to explore the implications of scientific and technological developments, it is not always an accurate predictor of the future, and that the line between science fiction and fact can be blurry at times.
 
One of the main arguments in favor of the idea that science fiction is becoming fact is that many of the ideas and technologies depicted in science fiction have already been realized, or are in the process of being developed. For example, science fiction has long depicted the idea of space travel and exploration, and today we have a thriving space industry and a number of manned missions to other planets and celestial bodies. Similarly, science fiction has explored the idea of artificial intelligence and robots, and today we have advanced AI systems and robots that are capable of performing a wide range of tasks.
 
However, it is also important to recognize that science fiction is often based on speculative or theoretical ideas that may not be possible or practical in the real world. While science fiction can serve as a source of inspiration and a way to explore the implications of scientific and technological developments, it is not always an accurate predictor of the future. Many ideas and technologies depicted in science fiction may remain firmly in the realm of fiction due to technological, economic, or other constraints.
 
Another factor to consider is that the line between science fiction and fact can be blurry at times, and that what was once considered science fiction can eventually become a reality. For example, the idea of space travel was once considered science fiction, but today it is a reality. Similarly, the internet, which was once the stuff of science fiction, is now an integral part of modern life. This suggests that science fiction can serve as a catalyst for scientific and technological advancements, and that what was once considered science fiction may eventually become a reality.
 
In conclusion, while science fiction often serves as a source of inspiration and a way to explore the implications of scientific and technological developments, it is not always an accurate predictor of the future. The line between science fiction and fact can be blurry at times, and what was once considered science fiction may eventually become a reality. However, it is important to recognize that science fiction is often based on speculative or theoretical ideas that may not be possible or practical in the real world, and that not all ideas and technologies depicted in science fiction will become a reality.
 
 
8) Examine the role of music in establishing a national identity in your society.
 
Music has always played a central role in establishing a national identity in many societies around the world. It is a powerful medium for expressing cultural values and traditions, and for fostering a sense of belonging and community among people. In this essay, I will examine the role of music in establishing a national identity in [insert society], and argue that it is a crucial element in defining and promoting the unique cultural character of a nation.
 
One of the main ways that music can establish a national identity is through the use of traditional musical forms and instruments. In many societies, traditional music is an integral part of the cultural heritage and serves as a way to preserve and pass down cultural traditions from one generation to the next. For example, [insert examples of traditional music and instruments from your society] are deeply rooted in the cultural history of [your society], and are often seen as an expression of the nation’s unique character and identity.
 
Another way that music can establish a national identity is through the use of lyrics and themes that reflect the values and experiences of a particular society. For example, [insert examples of music from your society that reflects the values and experiences of the society]. By expressing ideas and emotions that are relevant and meaningful to people in [your society], this music helps to foster a sense of shared identity and belonging.
 
Music can also play a role in shaping public discourse and shaping public opinion on important issues. For example, [insert examples of music from your society that has had an impact on public discourse or shaped public opinion]. Through the use of lyrics and themes, this music can raise awareness about important issues and promote social change.
 
Despite the important role that music plays in establishing a national identity, it is important to recognize that there may be different opinions about which music represents the true character and identity of a nation. Different groups within a society may have different interpretations of what constitutes “authentic” or “traditional” music, and there may be debates about the role of music in shaping public opinion and discourse. However, despite these differences, it is clear that music is a powerful and enduring force in establishing a national identity, and that it has the ability to connect people across generations and cultures.
 
In conclusion, music plays a crucial role in establishing a national identity in [your society]. Through the use of traditional musical forms and instruments, lyrics and themes that reflect the values and experiences of the society, and its impact on public discourse and opinion, music helps to define and promote the unique cultural character of a nation. Despite differences of opinion about what constitutes authentic or traditional music, it is clear that music is a powerful and enduring force in shaping a national identity.
 
 
9) To what extent are people judged more by their physical appearances than by their abilities?
 
It is often said that people are judged more by their physical appearances than by their abilities, and that appearance plays a significant role in shaping how people are perceived and treated. This is a complex and highly debated issue that touches on a number of deeper questions about human nature, social norms, and the role of appearance in society. In this essay, I will argue that while physical appearance is certainly an important factor in how people are judged and perceived, it is not the only factor, and that people are also judged by their abilities and other qualities.
 
One of the main arguments in favor of the idea that people are judged more by their physical appearances than by their abilities is that appearance has a powerful impact on how people are perceived and treated. Research has shown that people tend to make judgments about others based on their appearance, and that these judgments can have a significant influence on how people are treated in social situations. For example, people who are perceived as attractive are often treated more positively than those who are perceived as less attractive, and may have an advantage in social and professional situations.
 
However, it is also important to recognize that people are judged by more than just their physical appearances. While appearance can certainly play a role in how people are perceived and treated, it is not the only factor, and people are also judged by their abilities, personality, and other qualities. For example, people who are intelligent, hardworking, and skilled are often respected and admired, regardless of their appearance. Similarly, people who are kind, compassionate, and empathetic are often well-liked and respected, regardless of their physical appearance.
 
Another factor to consider is that the relative importance of appearance and abilities may vary depending on the context. In some situations, appearance may be more important, while in other situations abilities may be more important. For example, in a modeling career or acting, physical appearance is likely to be more important, while in a scientific or technical field, abilities and skills may be more important.
 
In conclusion, while physical appearance is certainly an important factor in how people are judged and perceived, it is not the only factor, and people are also judged by their abilities and other qualities. The relative importance of appearance and abilities may vary depending on the context, and it is important to recognize that people are complex and multifaceted, and that appearance is only one aspect of who they are.
 
 
10) Practical ability is just as important as intellectual skills. How far is this true in your society?
 
There is a common belief that practical ability is just as important as intellectual skills, and that both are necessary for success in life. This belief is based on the idea that while intellectual skills, such as problem-solving and critical thinking, are important for achieving success in academic and professional settings, practical ability, such as the ability to work with one’s hands and to apply knowledge in a practical setting, is also essential for success in life. In this essay, I will examine the extent to which this is true in [your society], and argue that while both intellectual skills and practical ability are important, the relative importance of each may vary depending on the context and individual circumstances.
 
One of the main arguments in favor of the idea that practical ability is just as important as intellectual skills is that practical ability is often necessary for success in certain fields and occupations. For example, in fields such as trades, manufacturing, and construction, practical ability is often a crucial component of success, as it allows individuals to apply their knowledge in a practical setting and to work effectively with their hands. Similarly, in many technical and scientific fields, practical ability is often an important component of success, as it allows individuals to apply their knowledge in a hands-on setting and to solve real-world problems.
 
However, it is also important to recognize that the relative importance of practical ability and intellectual skills may vary depending on the context and individual circumstances. In some fields, intellectual skills may be more important, while in other fields practical ability may be more important. For example, in fields such as finance, marketing, and law, intellectual skills, such as critical thinking and problem-solving, may be more important, while in fields such as trades, manufacturing, and construction, practical ability may be more important.
 
Another factor to consider is that both intellectual skills and practical ability are important for success in life, and that a balance of both is often necessary. While it is important to have strong intellectual skills, it is also important to have the ability to apply this knowledge in a practical setting and to work effectively with one’s hands. Similarly, while it is important to have strong practical ability, it is also important to have the intellectual skills to understand and analyze complex problems and to make informed decisions.
 
In conclusion, while both intellectual skills and practical ability are important for success in life, the relative importance of each may vary depending on the context and individual circumstances. In some fields and occupations, practical ability may be more important, while in other fields intellectual skills may be more important. It is important to recognize that both are important and that a balance of both is often necessary for success in life.
 
 
11) Assess the view that attempts to control climate change can never be truly effective.
 
Climate change is one of the most pressing and controversial issues of our time, and there is ongoing debate about the effectiveness of attempts to control it. Some people argue that attempts to control climate change can never be truly effective, and that it is an insurmountable problem that cannot be solved. Others argue that while the problem of climate change is complex and challenging, it is not insurmountable, and that there are effective strategies and technologies that can help to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change. In this essay, I will assess the view that attempts to control climate change can never be truly effective, and argue that while there are certainly challenges and limitations to controlling climate change, it is not an insurmountable problem, and that there are effective strategies and technologies that can help to address it.
 
One of the main arguments in favor of the view that attempts to control climate change can never be truly effective is that the problem is simply too large and complex to be solved. Climate change is a global problem that is caused by a wide range of factors, including industrial and economic activities, population growth, and energy use. It is also a long-term problem, with impacts that will be felt for generations to come. Some people argue that the scale and complexity of the problem make it impossible to control, and that efforts to address climate change will inevitably be inadequate.
 
However, it is important to recognize that there are effective strategies and technologies that can help to control climate change and mitigate its impacts. For example, there are a number of renewable energy technologies, such as solar and wind power, that can help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and slow the pace of climate change. There are also strategies for reducing energy use and increasing energy efficiency, such as improving building codes and investing in public transportation, which can help to reduce emissions and slow the pace of climate change. In addition, there are strategies for adapting to the impacts of climate change, such as developing drought-resistant crops and improving infrastructure to withstand extreme weather events, which can help to reduce the vulnerability of communities to the impacts of climate change.
 
Another factor to consider is that while it may be difficult to control climate change, it is not impossible, and there are examples of successful efforts to address the problem. For example, the Montreal Protocol, an international treaty that aims to protect the ozone layer, has been successful in reducing the use of ozone-depleting substances and slowing the rate of ozone depletion. Similarly, the Clean Air Act, a federal law in the United States, has been successful in reducing air pollution and improving air quality. These examples demonstrate that it is possible to control environmental problems and make progress in addressing them.
 
In conclusion, while there are certainly challenges and limitations to controlling climate change, it is not an insurmountable problem, and there are effective strategies and technologies that can help to address it. While the problem of climate change is complex and long-term, there are examples of successful efforts to address environmental problems, and it is important to continue to pursue and invest in strategies that can help to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change.
 
 
12) The quality of written language is being destroyed by social media. What is your view?
 
There is a concern that the widespread use of social media is leading to a decline in the quality of written language. Some people argue that social media, with its emphasis on brevity and informality, is promoting a decline in standards of language usage and literacy, while others argue that social media is simply reflecting the way that people communicate in the modern world and is not causing a decline in language quality. In this essay, I will examine the argument that the quality of written language is being destroyed by social media, and argue that while social media may have some impact on language usage and literacy, it is not the primary cause of a decline in language quality.
 
One of the main arguments in favor of the view that social media is destroying the quality of written language is that it promotes a decline in standards of language usage and literacy. Some people argue that the informality and brevity of social media encourages the use of slang, abbreviations, and other forms of informal language that are not appropriate in formal writing. Others argue that the rapid pace and constant interruptions of social media make it difficult for people to focus and engage in deep reading and writing, leading to a decline in language skills.
 
However, it is important to recognize that social media is not the only factor that is impacting language usage and literacy. There are a number of other factors that contribute to the decline in language quality, including the decline of traditional print media, the increasing use of text messaging and other forms of electronic communication, and the influence of popular culture. It is also important to recognize that social media is simply a reflection of the way that people communicate in the modern world, and that it is not the cause of a decline in language quality.
 
Another factor to consider is that social media can also have a positive impact on language usage and literacy. For example, social media provides a platform for people to express themselves and share their ideas with a wide audience, which can help to promote literacy and critical thinking skills. In addition, social media can be an important tool for promoting language learning and cultural exchange, as it allows people to connect with others from different parts of the world and learn about different languages and cultures.
 
In conclusion, while social media may have some impact on language usage and literacy, it is not the primary cause of a decline in language quality. There are a number of other factors that contribute to the decline in language quality, and it is important to recognize that social media is simply a reflection of the way that people communicate in the modern world. While there may be some negative impacts of social media on language usage and literacy, there are also positive impacts, and it is important to consider both sides of the argument.
 
 

GP A Level 2016 Questions

1) Any adaptation of a novel for a film, television or the theatre is never as effective as the original. Discuss.
 
The process of adapting a novel for a film, television, or the theatre can be a tricky one. While it can often lead to a successful and entertaining final product, it can also result in a significant loss of nuance and depth. This is because the mediums of film, television, and theatre are vastly different from that of the written word, and as such, it can be difficult to capture the same level of complexity and emotion in an adaptation as there is in the original novel.
 
One of the biggest challenges in adapting a novel is that of compression. A novel can often contain hundreds of pages of detailed description, character development, and intricate plotlines, while a film or television show only has a limited amount of time in which to tell the story. This means that many elements of the original novel have to be cut or condensed in order to fit within the time constraints of the new medium. This can lead to a loss of important details and can prevent the audience from fully understanding and connecting with the characters and story.
 
Another challenge in adapting a novel is the difference in the way that the audience experiences the story. When reading a novel, the reader is able to imagine the characters and settings in their own mind, and is able to take the time to fully understand the story and its themes. However, when watching a film or television show, the audience is presented with a pre-conceived interpretation of the story, which can often differ from the reader’s own imagination. This can make it difficult for the audience to fully engage with the story and can lead to a sense of disconnection.
 
Furthermore, the mediums of film, television, and theatre also have their own conventions and styles, which may not always be the best fit for a particular story. For example, a novel that relies heavily on internal thoughts and feelings may struggle to translate effectively to a visual medium such as film or television, where it’s harder to communicate emotions and thoughts. Similarly, a novel that’s heavy on action and special effects may not be able to be replicated on stage.
 
Despite these challenges, there have been many successful adaptations of novels over the years. However, these are often the exception rather than the rule, and it is important to remember that while an adaptation may be enjoyable in its own right, it can never fully capture the complexity and depth of the original novel.
 
In conclusion, while adaptations of novels for film, television, and theatre can be entertaining and engaging, they can never fully capture the same level of complexity and depth as the original novel. The mediums of film, television, and theatre are vastly different from that of the written word and therefore, the process of adapting a novel for these mediums is inherently challenging. As such, it’s essential to approach adaptations with a degree of skepticism and to remember that they can never fully replace the original work.
 
 
2) Assess the view that traditional buildings have no future in your society.
 
In today’s society, traditional buildings are often seen as outdated and irrelevant. Many people believe that these buildings have no future in our society and that they should be replaced with modern, more efficient structures. However, this view is short-sighted and fails to take into account the many benefits that traditional buildings offer.
 
First and foremost, traditional buildings are an important part of our cultural heritage. They are often unique and irreplaceable landmarks that reflect the history and identity of a community. They provide a tangible link to the past and help to connect us to the stories, people and events that have shaped our society.
 
Furthermore, traditional buildings are often constructed using high-quality materials and techniques, making them more durable and long-lasting than many modern structures. This not only reduces the need for frequent repairs and renovations but also help to conserve natural resources. Traditional buildings also use natural ventilation, that help to regulate the internal temperature and also lower the energy consumption.
 
Additionally, traditional buildings can also be more sustainable than their modern counterparts. They often use natural materials that are renewable and biodegradable, such as wood, and are designed to be in harmony with the natural environment. This can help to reduce the carbon footprint of a building and contribute to a more sustainable future.
 
Moreover, traditional buildings often serve as a source of inspiration for contemporary architects and designers. They can be adapted and updated to meet the needs of modern society while still preserving the traditional architectural elements that make them unique and significant. With creative approach and with proper planning, traditional buildings can be brought up to current standards in terms of accessibility, energy efficiency, and safety, while preserving their cultural and architectural values.
 
While it may be tempting to believe that traditional buildings have no place in our society, it is important to remember that they are an essential part of our cultural heritage and offer many benefits in terms of sustainability and inspiration. Rather than being seen as a hindrance, traditional buildings should be recognized as a valuable asset to our society and protected for future generations.
 
In conclusion, the belief that traditional buildings have no future in our society is not only mistaken but also detrimental to the cultural, historical and architectural heritage of a community. Traditional buildings are not just a relic of the past, but they have a vital role to play in shaping our future by providing an inspiration to contemporary architects, helping to conserve resources and promoting sustainability. Therefore, it is important to recognize their value, and preserve them for future generations.
 
 
3) Longer life expectancy creates more problems than benefits. Discuss.
 
With advances in medicine and technology, life expectancy has been steadily increasing in recent years. While this may seem like a positive development, it is important to consider whether longer life expectancy is creating more problems than benefits for society.
 
One major problem is the strain on healthcare and social security systems. As people live longer, they are more likely to develop chronic health conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes, and dementia, which can be expensive to treat and manage. This can put a strain on healthcare systems, leading to increased costs and longer wait times for medical treatment. Furthermore, longer life expectancy also means that people will spend more years in retirement, putting a strain on social security systems and pension funds, making it difficult to sustain the current systems and plan for future.
 
Another problem is the economic impact of an aging population. As people live longer, they are more likely to stay in the workforce longer, leading to increased competition for jobs and reduced opportunities for younger workers. Additionally, older workers may also be less productive and may require more time off for health reasons, which can lead to increased costs for employers. This can have a negative effect on overall economic growth and can make it harder for younger people to find employment.
 
Moreover, longer life expectancy also creates issues for families and communities. As people live longer, they may become more dependent on their children and grandchildren for support, which can create added financial and emotional burdens. Additionally, longer life expectancy can also mean that people will outlive their friends and family, leading to a sense of isolation and loneliness. Moreover, it also leads to more pressure on limited resources such as housing and care facilities for elderly.
 
On the other hand, there are some benefits to longer life expectancy. For one, people will have more time to enjoy the things they love and to make meaningful contributions to their communities. Additionally, a longer life expectancy can also allow people to continue learning and growing throughout their lives, leading to a more informed and engaged population. Moreover, people will have more time to accumulate savings and plan for their financial well-being, and also to spend more time with their loved ones.
 
In conclusion, while longer life expectancy is often viewed as a positive development, it is important to consider the problems it can create for society. From healthcare and social security systems to economic growth and family dynamics, there are many issues that need to be addressed. However, it is also important to remember the benefits that longer life expectancy can bring, such as more time to enjoy life and make meaningful contributions. Therefore, a balance needs to be struck between the benefits and problems of longer life expectancy and society needs to be prepared to address the challenges it poses, while still being able to enjoy the benefits it brings.
 
 
4) Considering the money involved, should developing countries be allowed to host major sporting events?
 
The question of whether developing countries should be allowed to host major sporting events is a complex one, with valid arguments on both sides. On one hand, hosting a major sporting event can bring significant economic benefits to a developing country, including increased tourism and investment. On the other hand, the cost of hosting such an event can be incredibly high, and some argue that this money would be better spent on addressing more pressing issues such as poverty, healthcare and education.
 
One of the main arguments in favor of developing countries hosting major sporting events is the economic benefits they can bring. Major sporting events, such as the Olympic Games or the World Cup, can attract millions of tourists and generate billions of dollars in revenue. This can have a positive impact on local businesses, creating jobs and boosting economic growth. Additionally, hosting a major event can also help to improve a country’s infrastructure and bring attention to the country on the international stage, which can be beneficial for attracting foreign investment.
 
However, the cost of hosting a major sporting event can be astronomical, and many argue that this money would be better spent on more pressing issues. The construction of new stadiums, hotels, and transportation infrastructure can be incredibly expensive, and many developing countries simply do not have the resources to fund such projects. Additionally, the cost of providing security and other services for the event can also be high. Furthermore, after the event is over, many of these infrastructure and facilities may remain underutilized and end up being a burden for local communities.
 
Another concern is that the benefits of hosting a major sporting event may not be evenly distributed throughout the population. Instead, they may be concentrated among a small group of people, particularly those in the tourism and construction industries. This can lead to an increase in income inequality and further marginalize already marginalized communities.
 
However, it’s also important to note that not all major sporting events are created equal. Smaller-scale events such as regional or continental events may not have the same impact on a country’s economy, but also may not require such heavy investment, and also can be a good way for a country to test its capacity and readiness for future major events. Moreover, with the proper planning, transparency and community engagement, the negative impacts of the events can be mitigated and the benefits can be more evenly distributed.
 
In conclusion, whether developing countries should be allowed to host major sporting events is a complex issue that requires careful consideration. While hosting such events can bring significant economic benefits, the cost of doing so can be high, and the money would be better spent addressing more pressing issues such as poverty, healthcare, and education. However, with the proper planning and consideration, it is possible for developing countries to host major sporting events while still addressing these issues and mitigating negative impacts.
 
 
5) Human need, rather than profit, should always be the main concern of scientific research. Discuss.
 
The purpose of scientific research is to expand human knowledge and to find new solutions to problems. However, it’s crucial to consider that research is often driven by financial interests and considerations, rather than solely by human needs. This raises the question of whether human need, rather than profit, should always be the main concern of scientific research.
 
One of the main arguments in favor of basing scientific research on human need is that it can lead to research that is more focused and relevant to people’s lives. When research is driven by profit, it can often be focused on areas that are most likely to generate financial returns, rather than on areas that are most likely to improve people’s lives. By prioritizing human need, research can be directed towards finding solutions to the most pressing problems, such as poverty, disease, and environmental degradation, which can have a significant impact on people’s lives.
 
Additionally, basing scientific research on human need can also lead to more ethical research practices. When profit is the main concern, researchers may be tempted to cut corners or to prioritize their own financial gain over the well-being of participants or the broader public. By basing research on human need, the focus is shifted towards finding solutions that are in the best interests of society, rather than on maximizing profits.
 
Moreover, when human needs are prioritized, research can be more inclusive, by taking into account the needs of marginalized communities. This can lead to solutions that are tailored to the specific needs of these communities and ensure that their voices are heard.
 
However, it’s also important to recognize that scientific research requires funding and investment, and profit can play a vital role in this area. Many innovative solutions and breakthroughs were made possible because of the private sector’s investment in research. Additionally, many nonprofit organizations, foundations, and government agencies also rely on funding from private sources, such as philanthropy, grants, and partnerships with the private sector, to support their work. Therefore, profit should not be seen as an obstacle to addressing human needs, but rather as one of the ways to support it.
 
In conclusion, while profit has a crucial role to play in supporting scientific research, it’s important that human need is always at the forefront of the research agenda. By prioritizing human need, research can be more focused and relevant, more ethical, and more inclusive. It’s not a question of choosing between human need and profit, but rather, to find a balance between the two, and to ensure that the primary goal of scientific research is to improve people’s lives.
 
 
6) Countries experiencing conflict should be left to sort out their own problems. How far do you agree?
 
The question of how to respond to countries experiencing conflict is a complex and controversial one. Some argue that these countries should be left to sort out their own problems, while others argue that the international community has a moral and ethical obligation to intervene.
 
One argument in favor of non-interference is the principle of state sovereignty. Countries have the right to govern themselves and to resolve their own conflicts without outside interference. By respecting the sovereignty of other countries, nations can avoid meddling in other countries internal affairs and respect their right to self-determination.
 
Another argument for non-interference is that external intervention can often have unintended and negative consequences. Military intervention can escalate a conflict, causing more harm and suffering for the local population. Additionally, outside intervention can also lead to increased resentment among the local population, making it harder for the international community to play a constructive role in resolving the conflict.
 
Moreover, it’s also important to take into account that internal conflicts can be incredibly complex, with many different actors and motivations. External actors may not fully understand the situation, and even if they try to help, they may not have the same level of cultural understanding, language and historical knowledge, making their actions less effective. Therefore, it may be better to allow the local population to find a resolution on their own terms, rather than imposing a solution from the outside.
 
On the other hand, it’s also important to remember that non-interference may lead to ongoing human rights abuses and suffering, particularly if the conflict has a regional impact or if it’s a genocide. Furthermore, if the conflict is escalating and causing mass atrocities, it may be incumbent upon the international community to intervene, in order to prevent further loss of life. Additionally, if the conflict is causing a refugee crisis, with people displaced, seeking asylum and crossing borders, it may be necessary for the international community to provide aid and protection for those affected.
 
In conclusion, the question of whether countries experiencing conflict should be left to sort out their own problems is a complex one, with arguments to be made on both sides. While respecting the sovereignty of other countries and avoiding unintended negative consequences is important, it is also necessary to consider the impact of non-interference on human rights, regional stability and the well-being of the local population. Therefore, it’s important to approach this question with a balance perspective, looking at both the principles of non-interference and the moral and ethical obligations to protect human rights and prevent mass atrocities.
 
 
7) How far has modern technology made it unnecessary for individuals to possess mathematical skills?
 
In recent years, modern technology has made tremendous advancements, and it has had a profound impact on many aspects of our lives. One of the areas in which technology has made significant progress is in the field of mathematics. With the advent of powerful calculators, smartphones, and software such as spreadsheets and mathematical modeling tools, it’s possible to perform complex mathematical calculations and analyses quickly and easily. As a result, some argue that these developments have made it unnecessary for individuals to possess strong mathematical skills. However, this argument is not entirely accurate, as there are still many situations in which mathematical skills are essential, and in which technology alone is not sufficient.
 
One of the most obvious examples of when mathematical skills are still essential is in education. While technology can certainly be a useful tool for students to use in learning mathematics, it cannot replace the need for a strong mathematical foundation. Understanding the concepts and principles of mathematics is essential for students to be able to use technology effectively, and for them to be able to apply mathematical thinking to solve problems.
 
Moreover, mathematical skills are also essential in many professional fields, such as engineering, finance, and economics. While technology can be used to perform calculations and analyses, it cannot replace the need for individuals to understand the underlying principles and concepts. Furthermore, many of these fields require the ability to interpret and communicate the results of these analyses in a clear and meaningful way, which cannot be done without a strong mathematical background.
 
In addition, mathematical skills are also important in everyday life. Being able to calculate a budget, do conversions, or make basic computations like figuring out discounts and tip, can be an everyday task that most people can encounter. Even in the era of technology, individuals should have a basic mathematical understanding to navigate these daily tasks.
 
While technology has certainly made it easier to perform mathematical calculations, it has not made mathematical skills unnecessary. Instead, technology has changed the way we use and apply mathematical skills, and has made it possible to perform many calculations and analyses that would have been impossible in the past. However, understanding mathematical concepts, principles and being able to apply mathematical thinking, remains essential, whether in education, professional fields or everyday life.
 
In conclusion, while technology has certainly made it easier to perform mathematical calculations, it has not made mathematical skills unnecessary. In fact, mathematical skills are still essential in many areas of our lives. From education to professional fields, understanding mathematical concepts and principles, as well as being able to apply mathematical thinking, remains crucial. Therefore, technology should be seen as a tool that can enhance mathematical skills rather than replace them.
 
 
8) People who do the most worthwhile jobs rarely receive the best financial rewards. To what extent is this true of your society?
 
The belief that people who do the most worthwhile jobs rarely receive the best financial rewards is a common one. This sentiment is often expressed in the idea that “those who serve the most, receive the least.” In many societies, this notion holds true, with many essential workers, such as teachers, healthcare workers, and social workers, receiving relatively low pay compared to those in other fields. However, this is not necessarily true in every society and it is an issue that varies in its severity based on the country and context.
 
One of the main reasons why people in certain worthwhile jobs may not receive the best financial rewards is due to the societal value placed on those jobs. Often, jobs that are considered to be more “prestigious” or “high-status” are those that offer high pay, while jobs that are considered to be “low-status” or “less prestigious” tend to offer lower pay. For example, in many societies, jobs in finance, law, and technology are considered to be high-status and offer high pay, while jobs in education, healthcare, and social work are considered to be low-status and offer lower pay.
 
Another reason why people in certain worthwhile jobs may not receive the best financial rewards is due to systemic issues such as discrimination, bias, and lack of union representation, which often results in undervaluation and underpayment. This can be especially true for certain marginalized communities, and in certain sectors like care work and domestic work, where workers are mostly women, and therefore this work is considered to be less valuable.
 
Moreover, in some countries, governments and institutions tend to allocate more funding to other areas of the budget, such as defense, and security, rather than investing in essential sectors such as education and healthcare, leading to insufficient funding for these crucial areas, and as a result, resulting in low pay for workers in these sectors.
 
However, it’s also important to note that the situation is not the same everywhere and in some societies and countries, the government, private sector and society at large, values the contributions of essential workers, and as a result, their wages are competitive with those in other sectors. Additionally, initiatives such as collective bargaining, union representation, and campaigns for fair pay, can help to ensure that essential workers receive fair compensation for their work.
 
In conclusion, while it is true that people who do the most worthwhile jobs may not always receive the best financial rewards, it is an issue that varies in its severity across different societies and contexts. It is important to recognize and address the factors that contribute to this issue and advocate for policies and initiatives that value and support essential workers. Furthermore, it’s also crucial to consider the broader perspective of what constitutes financial rewards, and not just focus on the salary or wages.
 
 
9) Evaluate the claim that equality of opportunity for females is a desirable, but unrealistic, goal.
 
Equality of opportunity for females is a topic that has been widely debated in recent years. On one hand, there are those who argue that it is a desirable goal that should be actively pursued. On the other hand, there are those who argue that it is unrealistic and may even be harmful to try to achieve. In this essay, I will evaluate the claim that equality of opportunity for females is a desirable but unrealistic goal.
 
First, it is important to define what is meant by “equality of opportunity.” Generally, this refers to the idea that everyone, regardless of their gender, race, or socio-economic status, should have the same opportunities to succeed in life. This includes access to education, employment, and other resources that are necessary for success.
 
There is a strong argument to be made that equality of opportunity for females is a desirable goal. It is well-documented that women have faced discrimination and barriers to success throughout history, and that they continue to face these challenges today. For example, women still earn less than men on average, and they are underrepresented in many industries, particularly in leadership positions. Additionally, many women must contend with the added burden of balancing work and family responsibilities, which can make it more difficult for them to achieve success in their careers.
 
Equality of opportunity for women is important to strive towards because if it means a level playing field, it will not only help women but everyone, as society will be better off with the contribution of diversity. A society that is truly equal and inclusive will reap benefits in terms of productivity, creativity, and innovation. A diverse workplace has been shown to be more profitable and productive than one that is homogeneous. Allowing everyone to participate fully and equitably will bring out the best in society as a whole.
 
However, while equality of opportunity for females may be a desirable goal, it is also important to acknowledge that it is likely unrealistic. Despite the progress that has been made in recent years, discrimination and barriers to success still exist, and they are deeply ingrained in many aspects of our society. Changing these structures will take a significant amount of time, effort and resources. Additionally, achieving equality of opportunity may require difficult choices and sacrifices, such as making changes to cultural norms and shifting societal values.
 
Furthermore, achieving equality of opportunity for women does not necessarily mean that there will be an equal outcome for women and men, as some will argue that due to biological and societal differences, men and women will naturally gravitate towards different career paths, and that should be respected.
 
In conclusion, while equality of opportunity for females is a desirable goal, it is also important to acknowledge that it is likely unrealistic. While much progress has been made in recent years, discrimination and barriers to success still exist, and they are deeply ingrained in many aspects of our society. It will require significant time, effort, resources, and difficult choices and sacrifices to achieve equality of opportunity for women. Additionally, it is important to remember that achieving equality of opportunity does not necessarily mean achieving equal outcome, as there are many factors that can influence an individual’s success.
 
 
10) Assess the view that most natural disasters are the result of human activity.
 
The topic of natural disasters and their cause is a highly debated one, with some people arguing that most natural disasters are the result of human activity, while others argue that they are primarily due to natural causes. In this essay, I will assess the view that most natural disasters are the result of human activity.
 
First, it is important to define what is meant by “natural disasters.” These are typically defined as events such as hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, and droughts, which can cause significant damage to people and property.
 
There is a strong argument to be made that human activity plays a major role in the occurrence and severity of natural disasters. One of the key ways in which human activity contributes to natural disasters is through the destruction and degradation of natural habitats, such as forests and wetlands. These habitats play a crucial role in protecting against floods and storms, as well as preventing soil erosion. Additionally, human activities like urbanization, deforestation and degradation of natural habitats, cause land use change, disruption of water cycles and contribute to the exacerbation of natural hazards like flooding, landslides, and droughts.
 
Another way in which human activity contributes to natural disasters is through the emission of greenhouse gases, which are largely responsible for the warming of the planet. Climate change caused by human activity has been linked to an increase in the frequency and severity of natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods, and droughts. As the planet continues to warm, it is likely that these types of disasters will become more common and more destructive.
 
It is also worth mentioning that human activity can also increase the vulnerability of communities to natural disasters, for example through poor land use planning, inadequate building codes, lack of emergency preparedness and not investing in infrastructure that can reduce the risk of disasters.
 
While it is clear that human activity plays a major role in the occurrence and severity of natural disasters, it is also important to acknowledge that natural causes also contribute to these events. For example, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions are primarily caused by tectonic activity, and cannot be directly attributed to human activity. Additionally, factors such as weather patterns, ocean currents, and solar radiation also play a role in the occurrence of natural disasters.
 
In conclusion, while natural causes do contribute to natural disasters, it is clear that human activity plays a major role in the occurrence and severity of these events. The destruction and degradation of natural habitats, emissions of greenhouse gases, and poor planning and management of resources are among the key ways in which human activity contributes to natural disasters. It is important to continue to take steps to reduce the human impact on the environment, not just for the reduction of natural disasters but for the survival of humanity.
 
 
11) Is competition always desirable?
 
Competition is a concept that is deeply ingrained in our society and is often seen as a desirable and necessary aspect of life. However, there is a growing body of evidence that suggests that competition is not always desirable, and that there are many situations in which it can be detrimental. In this essay, I will argue that competition is not always desirable, and that there are situations in which it can be harmful.
 
First, it is important to define what is meant by “competition.” Generally, competition refers to the idea that individuals or groups are competing against each other in order to achieve a goal, such as winning a game or securing a job.
 
One of the main arguments against competition is that it can be detrimental to mental and physical health. Studies have shown that competition can lead to high levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. In addition to this, the constant focus on winning can lead to a lack of intrinsic motivation, a decrease in creativity, and an increase in negative behaviors such as cheating and bullying.
 
Competition can also be detrimental to relationships and social cohesion. When people are focused on winning, they may be less likely to cooperate with others and more likely to engage in negative behaviors such as cheating and backstabbing. This can cause a breakdown in trust and a lack of social cohesion.
 
Another argument against competition is that it is not an effective way to achieve many goals. For example, in a classroom setting, research has shown that competition between students often reduces motivation, creativity, and learning and can lead to cheating, while cooperative learning environments tend to produce better learning outcomes. Similarly, in a workplace setting, research has shown that competitive environments can lead to lower levels of productivity, higher turnover rates, and increased absenteeism.
 
Furthermore, competition can lead to inequality, as not everyone has the same level of resources, abilities and opportunities to win. Therefore, those who are less privileged are more likely to lose, and competition can perpetuate and exacerbate existing inequalities.
 
On the other hand, one could argue that competition brings out the best in people, spurring innovation, creativity, and progress. It is often cited as a driving force for progress, innovation, and economic growth. Additionally, it could be said that competition can foster a sense of personal accountability, encouraging individuals to take responsibility for their actions and work towards achieving their goals.
 
In conclusion, it is clear that competition is not always desirable. While it can bring out the best in people, it can also be detrimental to mental and physical health, relationships, and social cohesion, and can perpetuate inequality. Additionally, it is not always an effective way to achieve goals, and different approaches may be more beneficial. It is important for individuals, organizations, and society to carefully consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of competition and to find a balance that promotes growth and progress while also protecting the well-being of all involved.
 
 
12) Everyone has an opinion, but not everyone’s opinion is of equal value. What is your view?
 
It is true that everyone has an opinion, but not everyone’s opinion is of equal value. The value of an opinion depends on several factors, including the level of expertise, experience, and education of the person offering the opinion. In addition, the validity and soundness of an argument can also contribute to the value of an opinion.
 
One of the key factors that determines the value of an opinion is the level of expertise, experience, and education of the person offering the opinion. For example, if a medical doctor offers an opinion on a medical issue, their opinion would likely hold more weight than that of an individual with no medical background. Similarly, if a physicist offers an opinion on a physics problem, their opinion would hold more weight than that of an individual without a background in physics. This is because experts have a greater understanding of the subject matter, and their opinions are more likely to be accurate and well-informed.
 
The validity and soundness of an argument also contribute to the value of an opinion. An opinion that is based on sound logic and evidence is more likely to be true than one that is not. Furthermore, an opinion that can be supported by data, research, or other forms of evidence is more likely to be valid than one that is based solely on personal beliefs or anecdotes.
 
However, it is important to note that the value of an opinion is not solely determined by the level of expertise or the validity of an argument. Other factors such as personal biases, cultural perspectives, and the context in which the opinion is expressed can also influence the value of an opinion.
 
For example, a person’s personal biases can greatly affect the value of their opinion. If an individual holds a strong bias towards a particular subject, their opinion may not be as valuable because it is more likely to be influenced by their emotions rather than by reason. Similarly, cultural perspectives can also affect the value of an opinion. Different cultures may have different values and beliefs, which can lead to different opinions on a particular subject. Furthermore, the context in which an opinion is expressed can also affect its value. For example, an opinion that is offered in a private conversation may have less value than one that is offered in a public forum.
 
In conclusion, it is true that everyone has an opinion, but not everyone’s opinion is of equal value. The value of an opinion depends on several factors, including the level of expertise, experience, and education of the person offering the opinion, the validity and soundness of an argument, as well as personal biases, cultural perspectives, and context. Therefore, it is important for individuals to critically evaluate opinions and to consider these factors when determining the value of an opinion.
 
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *